Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28287828›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53

Testing Multiple Conceptualizations of Oppositional Defiant Disorder in Youth.

Thomas H Ollendick, Jordan A Booker, Sarah Ryan, Ross W Greene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Oppositional defiant disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas H Ollendicka Child Study Center, Department of Psychology , Virginia Tech.
Jordan A Bookerb Department of Psychology , Emory University.
Sarah Ryana Child Study Center, Department of Psychology , Virginia Tech.
Ross W Greenea Child Study Center, Department of Psychology , Virginia Tech.
Virginia Tech · USEmory University · US

Funding

VT Initiative for Maximizing Student DiversityR25GM072767 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI SMITH, EDWARD J · 2007 to 2021
$6.9M
ONE-SESSION TREATMENT FOR SPECIFIC PHOBIAS IN CHILDRENR01MH059308 · NIMH · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI OLLENDICK, THOMAS H. · 2001 to 2004
$1.5M
Mediators, Moderators and Treatment Outcomes with Oppositional Defiant DisorderR01MH076141 · NIMH · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI OLLENDICK, THOMAS H. · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM072767NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059308NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent theories conceptualize oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) as a two-dimensional construct with angry/irritable (i.e., affective) and argumentative/defiant (i.e., behavioral) components. This view has been supported by studies of nonreferred youth but not yet examined in clinic-referred youth. In a reanalysis of data regarding children who received one of two psychosocial ODD treatments, we examined multiple conceptualizations of ODD, whether children showed improvements across these ODD dimensions, and whether main and joint effects of ODD dimension improvement predicted clinical outcome. One hundred thirty-four clinic-referred youth (ages 7-14 years, 38% female, 84% White) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.) criteria for ODD received 1 of 2 psychosocial treatments. At pretreatment, 1-week follow-up, and 6-month follow-up, mothers reported child aggression and conduct problems, clinicians reported global clinical impairment and clinical improvement, and ODD symptom counts were collected from a semistructured diagnostic interview with mothers. Baseline ODD symptom were used to test previously supported multidimensional models. One- and two-factor conceptualizations were supported; however, the two-factor solution was preferred. With this solution, each dimension significantly and similarly improved across treatment conditions. Improvements across affective and behavioral ODD factors also had significant effects on clinician- and mother-reported clinical outcomes. The current findings provide empirical support for the ongoing study of multidimensional ODD conceptualizations in clinic-referred youth.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersAdolescentAttention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersChildFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID28287828
PMCPMC6752705
OpenAlexW2596045603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.