Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28287606›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the In Vivo Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines.

Jun Tang, Carlos Pérez-Medina, Yiming Zhao, Ahmad Sadique, Willem J M Mulder, Thomas Reiner

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. ACS sensors · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun TangDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; jun.tang.mssm@gmail.com.
Carlos Pérez-MedinaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Yiming ZhaoTranslational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Ahmad SadiqueDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Willem J M MulderTranslational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Thomas ReinerDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
PET/MRI to study nanotherapy in atherosclerosisR01HL125703 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MULDER, WILLEM · 2015 to 2018
$2.4M
A Surface Activable Nanoemulsion platform for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and TherapyR01CA155432 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MULDER, WILLEM · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Bioorthogonal Strategies for Targeted PET Imaging Probe DevelopmentK25EB016673 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI REINER, THOMAS · 2013 to 2015
$525k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155432NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125703NIBIB NIH HHS K25 EB016673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inspired by the success of previous cancer nanomedicines in the clinic, researchers have generated a large number of novel formulations in the past decade. However, only a small number of nanomedicines have been approved for clinical use, whereas the majority of nanomedicines under clinical development have produced disappointing results. One major obstacle to the successful clinical translation of new cancer nanomedicines is the lack of an accurate understanding of their in vivo performance. This article features a rigorous procedure to characterize the in vivo behavior of nanomedicines in tumor-bearing mice at systemic, tissue, single-cell, and subcellular levels via the integration of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), radioactivity quantification methods, flow cytometry, and fluorescence microscopy. Using this approach, researchers can accurately evaluate novel nanoscale formulations in relevant mouse models of cancer. These protocols may have the ability to identify the most promising cancer nanomedicines with high translational potential or to aid in the optimization of cancer nanomedicines for future translation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanomedicinePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographySkin NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID28287606
PMCPMC5409338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.