Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28287532›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing.

Ian G Mackey, Eric A Dixon, Kevin Johnson, Jiang-Ti Kong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05569486 (Elucidating the Central Mechanism), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05569486 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Elucidating the Central Mechanism(s) of Action for Green Light Therapy in Managing Chronic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArizonaRan2026 to 2029Enrolled70ConditionsFibromyalgiaArmsGreen Light
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Thermal temporal summation has good reliability in the lumbar region.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Psychophysics of Pain: A Methodological Introduction.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ian G MackeyAnesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Eric A DixonAnesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Kevin JohnsonAnesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Jiang-Ti KongAnesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine; jtkong@stanford.edu.

Funding

Research Training Using TMS to Study Pain Processing in Long-Term Opioid UseK23DA031808 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, KEVIN ANDREW · 2011 to 2015
$764k
Predicting Analgesic Response to Acupuncture - A Practical ApproachK23AT008477 · NCCIH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KONG, JIANG-TI · 2015 to 2019
$739k
NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT008477NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA031808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central facilitation and modulation of incoming nociceptive signals play an important role in the perception of pain. Disruption in central pain processing is present in many chronic pain conditions and can influence responses to specific therapies. Thus, the ability to precisely describe the state of central pain processing has profound clinical significance in both prognosis and prediction. Because it is not practical to record neuronal firings directly in the human spinal cord, surrogate behavior tests become an important tool to assess the state of central pain processing. Dynamic QST is one such test, and can probe both the ascending facilitation and descending modulation of incoming nociceptive signals via TS and CPM, respectively. Due to the large between-individual variability in the sensitivity to noxious signals, standardized TS and CPM tests may not yield any meaningful data in up to 50% of the population due to floor or ceiling effects. We present methodologies to individualize TS and CPM so we can capture these measures in a broader range of individuals than previously possible. We have used these methods successfully in several studies at the lab, and data from one ongoing study will be presented to demonstrate feasibility and potential applications of the methods.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemChronic PainHumansPain MeasurementPain PerceptionPain ThresholdPostsynaptic Potential Summation

Identifiers

PMID28287532
PMCPMC5407598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.