Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28287394›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Quantitative proteomics reveal proteins enriched in tubular endoplasmic reticulum of

Xinbo Wang, Shanshan Li, Haicheng Wang, Wenqing Shui, Junjie Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ER discontinuities are common inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Zoological research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A bird's-eye view of the endoplasmic reticulum in filamentous fungi.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xinbo WangDepartment of Genetics and Cell Biology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Shanshan LiiHuman Institute and School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Haicheng WangCollege of Life Sciences, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wenqing ShuiiHuman Institute and School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Junjie HuNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules and CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institue of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4712-2243
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNNankai University · CNShanghaiTech University · CN

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tubular network is a critical part of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The network is shaped by the reticulons and REEPs/Yop1p that generate tubules by inducing high membrane curvature, and the dynamin-like GTPases atlastin and Sey1p/RHD3 that connect tubules via membrane fusion. However, the specific functions of this ER domain are not clear. Here, we isolated tubule-based microsomes from

Indexed as

Cell FractionationEndoplasmic ReticulumImmunoprecipitationProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinsbiochemistrycell biologyendoplasmic reticulummembrane curvatureorganelle isolationquantitative proteomicsS. cerevisiaetubular network

Identifiers

PMID28287394
PMCPMC5358975
OpenAlexW2596002460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.