Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28287129›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

AKT1 and AKT2 isoforms play distinct roles during breast cancer progression through the regulation of specific downstream proteins.

Marina Riggio, María C Perrone, María L Polo, María J Rodriguez, María May, Martín Abba, Claudia Lanari, Virginia Novaro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmacological Evaluation ofCurrent cancer drug targets · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in chemistry · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. RSC advances · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marina RiggioInstituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), Vuelta de Obligado 2490 Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina.
María C PerroneInstituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), Vuelta de Obligado 2490 Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina.
María L PoloInstituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), Vuelta de Obligado 2490 Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina.
María J RodriguezInstituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), Vuelta de Obligado 2490 Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina.
María MayInstituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), Vuelta de Obligado 2490 Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina.
Martín AbbaCentro de Investigaciones Inmunológicas Básicas y Aplicadas. Fac. Ciencias Médicas - Universidad Nacional La Plata (1900), Argentina.
Claudia LanariInstituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), Vuelta de Obligado 2490 Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina.
Virginia NovaroInstituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), Vuelta de Obligado 2490 Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina.
Experimental Medicine and Biology Institute · ARUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the mechanisms associated with the specific effects of AKT1 and AKT2 isoforms in breast cancer progression. We modulated the abundance of specific AKT isoforms in IBH-6 and T47D human breast cancer cell lines and showed that AKT1 promoted cell proliferation, through S6 and cyclin D1 upregulation, but it inhibited cell migration and invasion through β1-integrin and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) downregulation. In contrast, AKT2 promoted cell migration and invasion through F-actin and vimentin induction. Thus, while overexpression of AKT1 promoted local tumor growth, downregulation of AKT1 or overexpression of AKT2 promoted peritumoral invasion and lung metastasis. Furthermore, we evaluated The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset for invasive breast carcinomas and found that increased AKT2 but not AKT1 mRNA levels correlated with a worse clinical outcome. We conclude that AKT isoforms play specific roles in different steps of breast cancer progression, with AKT1 involved in the local tumor growth and AKT2 involved in the distant tumor dissemination, having AKT2 a poorer prognostic value and consequently being a worthwhile target for therapy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticActinsAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCyclin D1Disease ProgressionFemaleHumansMice, Inbred NODMice, KnockoutMice, SCIDNeoplasm InvasivenessProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktActinsAKT1 protein, humanAKT2 protein, humanCyclin D1Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt

Identifiers

PMID28287129
PMCPMC5347151
OpenAlexW2595714719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.