Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28286924›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2017

Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Prithviraj Bose, Pankit Vachhani, Jorge E Cortes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04666649 (Pegcrisantaspase in Combination With Venetoclax for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 153 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04666649 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pegcrisantaspase in Combination With Venetoclax for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2021 to 2025Enrolled27ConditionsRelapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsVenetoclax and pegcrisantaspase
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Pharmacogenomic Score Effectively Personalizes Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prithviraj BoseDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, FC4.3062, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Pankit VachhaniDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Jorge E CortesDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, FC4.3062, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. jcortes@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementApproximately 40-45% of younger and 10-20% of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) will be cured with current standard chemotherapy. The outlook is particularly gloomy for patients with relapsed and/or refractory disease (cure rates no higher than 10%). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the only realistic hope of cure for these patients, is an option for only a minority. In recent years, much has been learned about the genomic and epigenomic landscapes of AML, and the clonal architecture of both de novo and secondary AML has begun to be unraveled. These advances have paved the way for rational drug development as new "drugable" targets have emerged. Although no new drug has been approved for AML in over four decades, with the exception of gemtuzumab ozogamycin, which was subsequently withdrawn, there is progress on the horizon with the possible regulatory approval soon of agents such as CPX-351 and midostaurin, the Food and Drug Administration "breakthrough" designation granted to venetoclax, and promising agents such as the IDH inhibitors AG-221 and AG-120, the smoothened inhibitor glasdegib and the histone deacetylase inhibitor pracinostat. In our practice, we treat most patients with relapsed/refractory AML on clinical trials, taking into consideration their prior treatment history and response to the same. We utilize targeted sequencing of genes frequently mutated in AML to identify "actionable" mutations, e.g., in FLT3 or IDH1/2, and incorporate small-molecule inhibitors of these oncogenic kinases into our therapeutic regimens whenever possible. In the absence of actionable mutations, we rationally combine conventional agents with other novel therapies such as monoclonal antibodies and other targeted drugs. For fit patients up to the age of 65, we often use high-dose cytarabine-containing backbone regimens. For older or unfit patients, we prefer hypomethylating agent-based therapy. Finally, all patients with relapsed/refractory AML are evaluated for allogeneic HSCT.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansImmunotherapyLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMolecular Targeted TherapyRecurrenceRetreatmentTreatment OutcomeAMLAntibody-drug conjugatesEpigenetic therapyFLT3 inhibitorsIDH inhibitorsTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID28286924
OpenAlexW2593230508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.