ReviewEmergency (Tehran, Iran)2017
Clinical Scoring Systems in Predicting the Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding; a Narrative Review.
Review in Emergency (Tehran, Iran), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nomogram model for predicting acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a study based on the MIMIC-IV database and external validation.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning predicts mortality in critically ill patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a MIMIC-IV study with external validation.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- The prognostic value of DIC score combined with lactate in patients with cirrhosis complicated by variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of pre-endoscopy risk scores and base deficit for prediction adverse clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of graded nursing based on the Glasgow-Blatchford score in liver cirrhosis patients complicated with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Predictive Utility of Pre- and Post-Endoscopic Risk Scores and Hemodynamic Indexes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Emergency Department.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a dynamic nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study in the intensive care unit.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predictive utility of the Rockall scoring system in patients suffering from acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Development of a Core Outcome Measure Instrument; "LeishCOM_LCL", for Localised Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Trends for Admission, Mortality and Emergency Surgery in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Study of Eight Years of Admissions in a Tertiary Care Hospital.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The Accuracy of Pre-Endoscopic Scores for Mortality Prediction in Patients with Upper GI Bleeding and No Endoscopy Performed.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Reduction of After-Hours and Weekend Effects in Upper Gastro-intestinal Bleeding Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic Compared to the Pre-Pandemic Period.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Gastrointestinal bleeding during anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists.Global cardiology science & practice · 2022Article
- Non-tuberculosis extensive abdominal lymph node calcification leading to portal hypertension with esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding: a rare case report.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Comparisons of six endoscopy independent scoring systems for the prediction of clinical outcomes for elderly and younger patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Prediction of in-hospital mortality after acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: cross-validation of several risk scoring systems.The Journal of international medical research · 2022Article
- Mortality Rate in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Associated with Anti-Thrombotic Therapy Before and During Covid-19 Pandemic.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Six Preendoscopy Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes for Older Adults with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prediction of the outcome and severity of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) has significant importance in patient care, disposition, and determining the need for emergent endoscopy. Recent international recommendations endorse using scoring systems for management of non-variceal UGIB patients. To date, different scoring systems have been developed for predicting the risk of 30-day mortality and re-bleeding. We have discussed the screening performance characteristics of Baylor bleeding score, the Rockall risk scoring score, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center predictive index, Glasgow Blatchford score, T-score, and AIMS65 systems, in the present review. Based on the results of this survey, there are only 3 clinical decision rules that can predict the outcome of UGIB patients, independent from endoscopy. Among these, only Glasgow Blatchford score was highly sensitive for predicting the risk of 30-day mortality and re-bleeding, simultaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28286843PMC5325906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.