ArticleFEBS open bio2017
DNA structural features of eukaryotic TATA-containing and TATA-less promoters.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural Features of DNA in TATA-Containing and TATA-Less Core Promoters of RNA Polymerase II Differ.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Fruit-Specific Promoters in Plants: Advances, Regulatory Mechanisms and Applications in Plant Biotechnology.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dual native G-quadruplex folding is associated with chromatin looping at the MYC locus.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- DNA Sequence Perplexity Reveals Evolutionarily Conserved Patterns in cis-Regulatory Regions Across Diverse Species.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- iPro-CSAF: identification of promoters based on convolutional spiking neural networks and spiking attention mechanism.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Beyond gluten: the multifaceted regulation of MHC class II in celiac disease pathogenesis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025Review
- Predicting bacterial transcription factor binding sites through machine learning and structural characterization based on DNA duplex stability.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- CDBProm: the Comprehensive Directory of Bacterial Promoters.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Physical Peculiarity of Two Sites in Human Promoters: Universality and Diverse Usage in Gene Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Mapping Chromatin Occupancy ofCells · 2023Article
- Predictions of DNA mechanical properties at a genomic scale reveal potentially new functional roles of DNA flexibility.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Nucleic Transformer: Classifying DNA Sequences with Self-Attention and Convolutions.ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- Mapping Chromatin Occupancy ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Chromatin analysis of adult pluripotent stem cells reveals a unique stemness maintenance strategy.Science advances · 2023Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence as a reliable annotator of archaeal promoter regions.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- High-throughput techniques enable advances in the roles of DNA and RNA secondary structures in transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene regulation.Genome biology · 2022Review
- Draft Genome Sequence of the EarthwormCurrent genomics · 2022Article
- A reappraisal of the form - function problem. Theory and phenomenology.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2022Article
- NFκB (RelA) mediates transactivation of hnRNPD in oral cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Critical assessment of computational tools for prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoter prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eukaryotic genes can be broadly classified as TATA-containing and TATA-less based on the presence of TATA box in their promoters. Experiments on both classes of genes have revealed a disparity in the regulation of gene expression and cellular functions between the two classes. In this study, we report characteristic differences in promoter sequences and associated structural properties of the two categories of genes in six different eukaryotes. We have analyzed three structural features, DNA duplex stability, bendability, and curvature along with the distribution of A-tracts, G-quadruplex motifs, and CpG islands. The structural feature analyses reveal that while the two classes of gene promoters are distinctly different from each other, the properties are also distinguishable across the six organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.