ArticleNursing open2017
Beall's list of predatory open access journals: RIP.
Article in Nursing open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing Ethical Issues in Biomedical and Dental Publishing.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Predatory nursing journals: A case study of author prevalence and characteristics.Nursing ethics · 2021Article
- Article
- Emerging nursing scholars guide to peer reviewing an academic manuscript.Nursing open · 2019Article
- Time to plan for Plan S.Nursing open · 2019Article
- Faculty Applicants' Attempt to Inflate CVs Using Predatory Journals.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Article
- Predatory publishing continues.Nursing open · 2019Article
- Negative Effects of "Predatory" Journals on Global Health Research.Annals of global health · 2018Review
- Problems and challenges of predatory journals.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2018Review
- Predatory publishers: Time for action.Nursing open · 2017Article
- Publication ethics: science versus commerce.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.