Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28286592›Full record

ArticleCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC

Opinions and preferences of British Columbia pharmacists and physicians on medication management services.

Nicole W Tsao, Amir Khakban, Louise Gastonguay, Zafar Zafari, Larry D Lynd, Carlo A Marra

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole W TsaoCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Tsao, Khakban, Gastonguay, Lynd), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.
Amir KhakbanCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Tsao, Khakban, Gastonguay, Lynd), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.
Louise GastonguayCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Tsao, Khakban, Gastonguay, Lynd), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.
Zafar ZafariCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Tsao, Khakban, Gastonguay, Lynd), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.
Larry D LyndCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Tsao, Khakban, Gastonguay, Lynd), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.
Carlo A MarraCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Tsao, Khakban, Gastonguay, Lynd), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication management (MM) services are being provided by pharmacists across Canada in various forms, but pharmacist-physician collaboration is still not a routine practice in most jurisdictions. This survey aimed to gather pharmacists' and physicians' opinions and preferences for MM provision.

methodsTwo parallel, cross-sectional online surveys, including best-worst scaling tasks, were designed for pharmacists and physicians in British Columbia to capture and compare their preferences for a number of attributes of MM.

resultsSurveys were completed by 119 pharmacists and 146 physicians. Results indicate that pharmacists and physicians had similar opinions on many aspects of MM. Ninety-five percent of pharmacists and 69% of physicians believed that additional health services are needed to help patients optimize the use of their medications. However, the majority of each group felt that they were the most important health care professional in providing this service. Most pharmacists (79%) and some physicians (25%) thought that optimizing use of medications would result in both decreased costs and utilization to the health care system. Both pharmacists and physicians felt that the best attribute of an MM service would be if the services resulted in improved health and medication use for patients. Both groups were motivated by increased remuneration for MM; however, the relative strength of preference for this was higher among physicians. Interestingly, physicians valued improved medication adherence as a result of MM more highly than pharmacists did. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionMost pharmacists and physicians agreed that improving patients' health and medication use would be the best attribute of MM and that there is a need for such services. However, physicians also had strong preferences for being remunerated for participating in MM provision.

Identifiers

PMID28286592
PMCPMC5330418
OpenAlexW2530755404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.