ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2006
Utility of the Nonabsorbed (<0.4%) Antibiotic Rifaximin in Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicted Environmental Risk Assessment of Antimicrobials with Increased Consumption in Portugal during the COVID-19 Pandemic; The Groundwork for the Forthcoming Water Quality Survey.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Rifaximin: recent advances in gastroenterology and hepatology.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral antibiotics have probable or documented therapeutic utility for multiple enteric conditions commonly treated by gastroenterologists and hepatologists, but they are not frequently prescribed. Barriers to antibiotic use include concerns about bacterial resistance, drug interactions, and antibiotic-associated side effects and toxicity, particularly in vulnerable populations. The use of minimally absorbed oral antibiotics has been suggested as an approach to overcoming some of these barriers, but minimally absorbed antibiotics have not been an important part of the US gastroenterologists' or hepatologists' armamentarium until recently. The 2004 introduction in the United States of the nonabsorbed (<0.4%) oral antibiotic rifaximin is cause for reassessing the potential usefulness of minimally absorbed oral antibiotics for bacterial enteric illness. Rifaximin has broad-spectrum in vitro antibacterial activity against enteric pathogens, gut-localized action, and minimal systemic absorption-a profile consistent with usefulness for a range of enteric conditions involving a pathogenetic role of bacteria. The emerging clinical profile of rifaximin also supports its potential utility for multiple enteric conditions. Rifaximin has a tolerability profile comparable to that of placebo and is not known to interact clinically with other medications. The efficacy of rifaximin is well documented for the treatment of infectious diarrhea caused by noninvasive pathogens and hepatic encephalopathy. A growing body of data supports the efficacy of rifaximin for additional enteric conditions, such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth, pouchitis, and antibiotic-associated colitis, that are characterized by acute bacterial infection or bacterial colonization. In addition, rifaximin has recently been demonstrated effective in the prevention of travelers' diarrhea and shigellosis in controlled clinical studies. Ongoing studies and more experience with rifaximin in clinical practice will help to further define the role of this antibiotic in gastroenterology and hepatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28286448PMC5335639W3025276231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.