Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28286448›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2006

Utility of the Nonabsorbed (<0.4%) Antibiotic Rifaximin in Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Chinyu G Su, Faten Aberra, Gary R Lichtenstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chinyu G SuDr. Su is Assistant Professor of Medicine, Dr. Aberra is Instructor in Medicine, and Dr. Lichtenstein is Professor of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in Philadelphia. Dr. Lichtenstein is also Director of the Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Gastroenterology Division.
Faten AberraDr. Su is Assistant Professor of Medicine, Dr. Aberra is Instructor in Medicine, and Dr. Lichtenstein is Professor of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in Philadelphia. Dr. Lichtenstein is also Director of the Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Gastroenterology Division.
Gary R LichtensteinDr. Su is Assistant Professor of Medicine, Dr. Aberra is Instructor in Medicine, and Dr. Lichtenstein is Professor of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in Philadelphia. Dr. Lichtenstein is also Director of the Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Gastroenterology Division.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral antibiotics have probable or documented therapeutic utility for multiple enteric conditions commonly treated by gastroenterologists and hepatologists, but they are not frequently prescribed. Barriers to antibiotic use include concerns about bacterial resistance, drug interactions, and antibiotic-associated side effects and toxicity, particularly in vulnerable populations. The use of minimally absorbed oral antibiotics has been suggested as an approach to overcoming some of these barriers, but minimally absorbed antibiotics have not been an important part of the US gastroenterologists' or hepatologists' armamentarium until recently. The 2004 introduction in the United States of the nonabsorbed (<0.4%) oral antibiotic rifaximin is cause for reassessing the potential usefulness of minimally absorbed oral antibiotics for bacterial enteric illness. Rifaximin has broad-spectrum in vitro antibacterial activity against enteric pathogens, gut-localized action, and minimal systemic absorption-a profile consistent with usefulness for a range of enteric conditions involving a pathogenetic role of bacteria. The emerging clinical profile of rifaximin also supports its potential utility for multiple enteric conditions. Rifaximin has a tolerability profile comparable to that of placebo and is not known to interact clinically with other medications. The efficacy of rifaximin is well documented for the treatment of infectious diarrhea caused by noninvasive pathogens and hepatic encephalopathy. A growing body of data supports the efficacy of rifaximin for additional enteric conditions, such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth, pouchitis, and antibiotic-associated colitis, that are characterized by acute bacterial infection or bacterial colonization. In addition, rifaximin has recently been demonstrated effective in the prevention of travelers' diarrhea and shigellosis in controlled clinical studies. Ongoing studies and more experience with rifaximin in clinical practice will help to further define the role of this antibiotic in gastroenterology and hepatology.

Indexed as

antibioticminimally absorbedRifaximin

Identifiers

PMID28286448
PMCPMC5335639
OpenAlexW3025276231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.