Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28286368›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2017

A Sound Therapy-Based Intervention to Expand the Auditory Dynamic Range for Loudness among Persons with Sensorineural Hearing Losses: Case Evidence Showcasing Treatment Efficacy.

Craig Formby, LaGuinn P Sherlock, Monica L Hawley, Susan L Gold

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Results of a 6-Month Field Trial of a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Trial
  2. Counseling Protocol for a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  3. Background and Rationale for a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Craig FormbyDepartment of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
LaGuinn P SherlockArmy Hearing Division, United States Army Public Health Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Maryland; National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Monica L HawleyDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Susan L GoldRetired; previously affiliated with the University of Maryland Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
University of Alabama · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USU.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine · US

Funding

Intervention for Reduced Sound ToleranceR01DC004678 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FORMBY, CHARLES CRAIG · 2002 to 2006
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Case evidence is presented that highlights the clinical relevance and significance of a novel sound therapy-based treatment. This intervention has been shown to be efficacious in a randomized controlled trial for promoting expansion of the dynamic range for loudness and increased sound tolerance among persons with sensorineural hearing losses. Prior to treatment, these individuals were unable to use aided sound effectively because of their limited dynamic ranges. These promising treatment effects are shown in this article to be functionally significant, giving rise to improved speech understanding and enhanced hearing aid benefit and satisfaction, and, in turn, to enhanced quality of life posttreatment. These posttreatment sound therapy effects also are shown to be sustained, in whole or part, with aided environmental sound and to be dependent on specialized counseling to maximize treatment benefit. Importantly, the treatment appears to be efficacious for hearing-impaired persons with primary hyperacusis (i.e., abnormally reduced loudness discomfort levels [LDLs]) and for persons with loudness recruitment (i.e., LDLs within the typical range), which suggests the intervention should generalize across most individuals with reduced dynamic ranges owing to sensorineural hearing loss. An exception presented in this article is for a person describing the perceptual experience of pronounced loudness adaptation, which apparently rendered the sound therapy inaudible and ineffectual for this individual. Ultimately, these case examples showcase the enormous potential of a surprisingly simple sound therapy intervention, which has utility for virtually all audiologists to master and empower the adaptive plasticity of the auditory system to achieve remarkable treatment benefits for large numbers of individuals with sensorineural hearing losses.

Indexed as

Adaptive plasticitydynamic range expansionhearing aid benefithyperacusisloudness recruitmentsensorineural hearing losssound therapysound tolerance.

Identifiers

PMID28286368
PMCPMC5344694
OpenAlexW2593149636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.