ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2017
Transplant genetics and genomics.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic testing in pediatric kidney transplant recipients to promote informed choice and improve individualized monitoring.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Review
- Exosomal miR-181d-5p Derived from Rapamycin-Conditioned MDSC Alleviated Allograft Rejection by Targeting KLF6.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Whole Exome Sequencing to Find Candidate Variants for the Prediction of Kidney Transplantation Efficacy.Genes · 2023Article
- A non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 genetic variant is associated with graft failure following kidney transplantation.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2023Article
- Assessing Donor Liver Quality and Restoring Graft Function in the Era of Extended Criteria Donors.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023Review
- Longitudinal Epigenome-Wide Analysis of Kidney Transplant Recipients Pretransplant and Posttransplant.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- An interleukin 6-based genetic risk score strengthened with interleukin 10 polymorphisms associated with long-term kidney allograft outcomes.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022Article
- Solving the puzzle of what makes immunotherapies work.Trends in cancer · 2022Review
- An Efficacious Transgenic Strategy for Triple Knockout of Xeno-Reactive Antigen Genes GGTA1, CMAH, and B4GALNT2 from Jeju Native Pigs.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Recent Progress and Future Direction for the Application of Multiomics Data in Clinical Liver Transplantation.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2022Review
- A functionalClinical kidney journal · 2022Article
- A practical approach to the genomics of kidney disorders.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Review
- Production of Triple-Gene (GGTA1, B2M and CIITA)-Modified Donor Pigs for Xenotransplantation.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Modeling the Potential of Treg-Based Therapies for Transplant Rejection: Effect of Dose, Timing, and Accumulation Site.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022Article
- Liquid biopsies: donor-derived cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft injury.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2021Review
- An accessible insight into genetic findings for transplantation recipients with suspected genetic kidney disease.NPJ genomic medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- A Multi-Marker Test for Analyzing Paired Genetic Data in Transplantation.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Joint testing of donor and recipient genetic matching scores and recipient genotype has robust power for finding genes associated with transplant outcomes.Genetic epidemiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ever since the discovery of the major histocompatibility complex, scientific and clinical understanding in the field of transplantation has been advanced through genetic and genomic studies. Candidate-gene approaches and recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have enabled a deeper understanding of the complex interplay of the donor-recipient interactions that lead to transplant tolerance or rejection. Genetic analysis in transplantation, when linked to demographic and clinical outcomes, has the potential to drive personalized medicine by enabling individualized risk stratification and immunosuppression through the identification of variants associated with immune-mediated complications, post-transplant disease or alterations in drug-metabolizing genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28286337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.