Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28286001›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Understanding High Utilization of Unscheduled Care in Pregnant Women of Low Socioeconomic Status.

Pooja K Mehta, Tamala Carter, Cjloe Vinoya, Shreya Kangovi, Sindhu K Srinivas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unplanned visits and midwife-led antenatal care.European journal of midwifery · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pooja K MehtaRobert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania/ Department of Veterans Affairs, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: pooja.mehta@bmc.org.
Tamala CarterPenn Center for Community Health Workers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Cjloe VinoyaMixed Methods Research Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Shreya KangoviPenn Center for Community Health Workers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sindhu K SrinivasDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Modifying Behavioral Response to Failure among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Risk FactorsK23HL128837 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KANGOVI, SHREYA · 2016 to 2019
$695k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL128837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant high utilizers of unscheduled care may be at particular risk for poor perinatal outcomes, but the drivers of this association have not been explored from the patient perspective. PURPOSE: We sought to understand maternal preference for unscheduled hospital-based obstetric care to inform interventions and improve value of publicly funded care during pregnancy.

methodsWe conducted a comparative qualitative analysis of in-depth semistructured interviews. Low-income pregnant women presenting to an inner city hospital-based obstetric triage unit were purposively sampled, categorized as either high or low utilizers of unscheduled care, and interviewed about challenges faced in obtaining pregnancy care and reasons for choosing between unscheduled versus scheduled care delivery.

resultsDemographically, high utilizers were similar to low utilizers, but were more likely to report adverse childhood experiences (p = .01). All 40 participants reported resource constraints and perceived hospital-based unscheduled obstetric care to be more accessible than outpatient prenatal care. Beyond this, high (n = 20) and low (n = 20) utilizer narratives differed significantly. Two distinct high utilizer profiles emerged. Some high utilizers repetitively used unscheduled hospital-based services owing to psychosocial determinants. Other high utilizing participants were driven by severe experiences of illness insufficiently addressed by outpatient prenatal care. Low utilizer narratives demonstrated high self-efficacy and social support compared with high utilizers.

conclusionsLow-value, unscheduled, hospital-based care utilization by pregnant women of low socioeconomic status was driven by unmet clinical and psychosocial need. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND/OR PRACTICE: Tailored community-focused innovations that use unscheduled visits as signals of risk may improve value of both outpatient and inpatient maternity care and better address adverse perinatal outcomes in vulnerable subgroups.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesDelivery, ObstetricPovertyAdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleHospitalizationHumansIncomeInterviews as TopicParturitionPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnant PeoplePrenatal CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID28286001
PMCPMC5857940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.