Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28286000›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

A Novel Interception Strategy in a Miniature Robber Fly with Extreme Visual Acuity.

Trevor J Wardill, Samuel T Fabian, Ann C Pettigrew, Doekele G Stavenga, Karin Nordström, Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predation via motion parallax in one of two gleaning insects.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Visual acuity ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Hoverfly (Eristalis tenax) pursuit of artificial targets.The Journal of experimental biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Temporal vision: measures, mechanisms and meaning.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Gravity and active acceleration limit the ability of killer flies (Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trevor J WardillDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB3 2EG, UK; Eugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering, MBL, 7 MBL Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA. Electronic address: tjw79@cam.ac.uk.
Samuel T FabianDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB3 2EG, UK.
Ann C PettigrewLeader Heights Animal Hospital, 199 Leaders Heights Road, York, PA 17402, USA.
Doekele G StavengaComputational Physics, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen 9747 AG, the Netherlands.
Karin NordströmCentre for Neuroscience, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Paloma T Gonzalez-BellidoDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB3 2EG, UK; Eugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering, MBL, 7 MBL Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA. Electronic address: ptg25@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L024667/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our visual system allows us to rapidly identify and intercept a moving object. When this object is far away, we base the trajectory on the target's location relative to an external frame of reference [1]. This process forms the basis for the constant bearing angle (CBA) model, a reactive strategy that ensures interception since the bearing angle, formed between the line joining pursuer and target (called the range vector) and an external reference line, is held constant [2-4]. The CBA model may be a fundamental and widespread strategy, as it is also known to explain the interception trajectories of bats and fish [5, 6]. Here, we show that the aerial attack of the tiny robber fly Holcocephala fusca is consistent with the CBA model. In addition, Holcocephala fusca displays a novel proactive strategy, termed "lock-on" phase, embedded with the later part of the flight. We found the object detection threshold for this species to be 0.13°, enabled by an extremely specialized, forward pointing fovea (∼5 ommatidia wide, interommatidial angle Δφ = 0.28°, photoreceptor acceptance angle Δρ = 0.27°). This study furthers our understanding of the accurate performance that a miniature brain can achieve in highly demanding sensorimotor tasks and suggests the presence of equivalent mechanisms for target interception across a wide range of taxa. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionVisual AcuityAnimalsDipteraPsychomotor Performanceflightinterception strategyinvertebratemoving targetpredationretinaspatial resolutiontrackingvision

Identifiers

PMID28286000
PMCPMC5364399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.