Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28285908›Full record

ReviewTrends in microbiology2017

Are CDI Systems Multicolored, Facultative, Helping Greenbeards?

Elizabeth S Danka, Erin C Garcia, Peggy A Cotter

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Burkholderia pseudomalleiMicrobiology spectrum · 2021
    Article
  5. Protein import and export across the bacterial outer membrane.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Extracellular Metabolism Sets the Table for Microbial Cross-Feeding.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021
    Review
  7. Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition in Bacteria: Do Not Get Too Close!International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. A membrane-depolarizing toxin substrate of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Capsule ProtectsFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Bacterial symbionts use a type VI secretion system to eliminate competitors in their natural host.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth S DankaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Erin C GarciaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of Kentucky, KY, USA.
Peggy A CotterDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: peggy_cotter@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

SEEDING POSTDOCTORAL INNOVATORS IN RESEARCH &EDUCATIONK12GM000678 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DONALD T LYSLE, Kathryn Joanna Reissner · 1999 to 2026
$30.9M
Contact-Dependent Signaling in BurkholderiaR01GM121110 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI COTTER, PEGGY A · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
BcpAIOB-Mediated CDI and Biofilm Formation in Burkholderia pseudomalleiR21AI112764 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI COTTER, PEGGY A · 2014 to 2015
$407k
Contact-Dependent Interbacterial Signaling in BurkholderiaK22AI118949 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GARCIA, ERIN C · 2016 to 2017
$270k
Inter-Bacterial Competition Systems in Burkholderia pseudomalleiF32AI096728 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GARCIA, ERIN C · 2011 to 2013
$155k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI096728NIAID NIH HHS K22 AI118949NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI112764NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM000678NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competitive and cooperative interactions between organisms, including bacteria, can significantly impact the composition of a community and the fitness of its members, as well as the fitness of their hosts when communities are living on or within other organisms. Understanding the underlying mechanisms is critical to the development of strategies to control microbiological communities that impact animal and plant health and also for understanding the evolution of social behaviors, which has been challenging for evolutionary biologists. Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) is a phenomenon defined by the delivery of a protein toxin to the cytoplasm of neighboring bacteria upon cell-cell contact, resulting in growth inhibition or death unless a specific immunity protein is present. CDI was first described based on observations of interbacterial killing and has been assumed to function primarily as a means of eliminating competitor cells. However, recent molecular evidence indicates that multiple levels of specificity restrict CDI toxin delivery and activity to the same bacterial strain, and that CDI system proteins can mediate cooperative behaviors among 'self' cells, a phenomenon called contact-dependent signaling (CDS). Here we review these recent findings and discuss potential biological and evolutionary implications of CDI system-mediated interbacterial competition and cooperation.

Indexed as

Contact InhibitionMicrobial InteractionsSignal TransductionAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsBurkholderiaEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coli Proteinsgrowth inhibitory proteinsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28285908
PMCPMC5400692
OpenAlexW2591947296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.