Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28285598›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard.

Maria Flaminia Persichetti, Laia Solano-Gallego, Angela Vullo, Marisa Masucci, Pierre Marty, Pascal Delaunay, Fabrizio Vitale, Maria Grazia Pennisi

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. AB Blood System Phenotypes Are Not Associated withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Acute Phase Proteins in Cats Naturally Infected or Seropositive forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. EAVLD 2024 - 7Italian journal of food safety · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Feline immunodeficiency virus, feline leukemia virus and Leishmania spp. prevalence in cats from shelters in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2024
    Article
  12. Immunoblotting Identification of Diagnostic Antigens ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  13. Is leishmaniasis the new emerging zoonosis in the world?Veterinary research communications · 2023
    Review
  14. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Feline leishmaniosis: hematological and biochemical analysis.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Maria Flaminia PersichettiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia, A. Mirri, Via G. Marinuzzi 3, Palermo, 90129, Italy.
Laia Solano-GallegoDepartament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals. Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Angela VulloIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia, A. Mirri, Via G. Marinuzzi 3, Palermo, 90129, Italy.
Marisa MasucciDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Messina , Polo Universitario Annunziata, Messina, 98168, Italy.
Pierre MartyCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Inserm U 1065, Hôpital de l'Archet, 151, route de Saint Antoine de Ginestière, CS 23079 06202, Nice Cedex 3, France.
Pascal DelaunayParasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital de l'Archet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, France-MIVEGEC, UMR IRD224 - CNRS 5290 - Université de Montpellier, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Fabrizio VitaleCentro di Referenza Nazionale per le Leishmaniosi (C.Re.Na.L), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia, A. Mirri, Via G. Marinuzzi 3, Palermo, 90129, Italy.
Maria Grazia PennisiDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Messina , Polo Universitario Annunziata, Messina, 98168, Italy. mariagrazia.pennisi@unime.it.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Sicilia · ITUniversity of Messina · ITCentre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire · FRMaladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs: Écologie, Génétique, Évolution et Contrôle · FRUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-Leishmania antibodies are increasingly investigated in cats for epidemiological studies or for the diagnosis of clinical feline leishmaniosis. The immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and western blot (WB) are the serological tests more frequently used. The aim of the present study was to assess diagnostic performance of IFAT, ELISA and WB to detect anti-L. infantum antibodies in feline serum samples obtained from endemic (n = 76) and non-endemic (n = 64) areas and from cats affected by feline leishmaniosis (n = 21) by a Bayesian approach without a gold standard.

methodsCut-offs were set at 80 titre for IFAT and 40 ELISA units for ELISA. WB was considered positive in presence of at least a 18 KDa band. Statistical analysis was performed through a written routine with MATLAB software in the Bayesian framework. The latent data and observations from the joint posterior were simulated in the Bayesian approach by an iterative Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique using the Gibbs sampler for estimating sensitivity and specificity of the three tests.

resultsThe median seroprevalence in the sample used for evaluating the performance of tests was estimated at 0.27 [credible interval (CI) = 0.20-0.34]. The median sensitivity of the three different methods was 0.97 (CI: 0.86-1.00), 0.75 (CI: 0.61-0.87) and 0.70 (CI: 0.56-0.83) for WB, IFAT and ELISA, respectively. Median specificity reached 0.99 (CI: 0.96-1.00) with WB, 0.97 (CI: 0.93-0.99) with IFAT and 0.98 (CI: 0.94-1.00) with ELISA. IFAT was more sensitive than ELISA (75 vs 70%) for the detection of subclinical infection while ELISA was better for diagnosing clinical leishmaniosis when compared with IFAT (98 vs 97%).

conclusionsThe overall performance of all serological techniques was good and the most accurate test for anti-Leishmania antibody detection in feline serum samples was WB.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanBayes TheoremCat DiseasesCatsFemaleImmunoglobulin GLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasis, VisceralMaleReference StandardsSensitivity and SpecificitySeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GBayesian analysisCatDiagnostic performanceELISAGold standardIFATLeishmaniaLeishmaniosisSerological diagnosisWestern blot

Identifiers

PMID28285598
PMCPMC5346856
OpenAlexW2592572146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.