Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28285586›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians.

Yen Thon Teoh, Sze Fui Hii, Mark A Stevenson, Stephen Graves, Robert Rees, John Stenos, Rebecca J Traub

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Detection of Rickettsia felis in Fleas of Companion Animals in East Texas.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cat fleas (Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Article
  6. Serosurvey of IgG Antibodies againstTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. ConcomitantBMJ case reports · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yen Thon TeohFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. yen.teoh@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1836-8762
Sze Fui HiiThe Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory, University Hospital, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Mark A StevensonFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Stephen GravesThe Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory, University Hospital, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Robert ReesBayer Animal Health, Tingalpa, QLD, 4173, Australia.
John StenosThe Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory, University Hospital, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Rebecca J TraubFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Geelong Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUBayer (Australia) · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi are emerging arthropod-borne zoonoses causing fever and flu-like symptoms. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with exposure to these organisms was explored in Australian veterinarians.

methodsOne hundred and thirty-one veterinarians from across Australia were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional survey. Veterinarians provided a single blood sample and answered a questionnaire on potential risk factors influencing their exposure to R. felis and R. typhi. Indirect microimmunofluorescence antibody testing (IFAT) was used to identify evidence of serological exposure of the participants to R. felis and R. typhi. Results were analyzed and a logistical regression model performed to predict risk factors associated with seropositivity.

resultsIn total, 16.0% of participants were seropositive to R. felis, 4.6% to R. typhi and 35.1% seropositive to both, where cross-reactivity of the IFAT between R. felis and R. typhi precluded a definitive diagnosis. Veterinarians residing within the south-eastern states of Victoria and Tasmania were at a higher risk of exposure to R. felis or generalised R. felis or R. typhi exposure. Older veterinarians and those that recommended flea treatment to their clients were found to be significantly protected from exposure.

conclusionsThe high exposure to R. felis amongst veterinary professionals suggests that flea-borne spotted fever is an important cause of undifferentiated fever conditions that may not be adequately recognized in Australia.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureVeterinariansAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueMaleRickettsia felisRickettsia InfectionsRickettsia typhiRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSerologic TestsSiphonapteraAntibodies, BacterialAustraliaflea-borne spotted fevermurine typhusRickettsiaRickettsia felisRickettsia typhiveterinarian

Identifiers

PMID28285586
PMCPMC5346837
OpenAlexW2593984766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.