ArticleInternational ophthalmology2018
Treatment satisfaction of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported outcome measures for medication treatment satisfaction: a systematic review of measure development and measurement properties.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- The management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcomes, patient mental health and caregiver burden.Acta ophthalmologica · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- nAMD: optimization of patient care and patient-oriented information with the help of an internet-based survey.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022Article
- Modifiable Determinants of Satisfaction with Intravitreal Treatment in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Drugs & aging · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the psychometric properties of the Greek Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ) and evaluate the factors that influence treatment satisfaction of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
methodsThe MacTSQ was translated into Greek and administered to 176 patients. All patients completed the SF-12 Health Survey and the Macular disease Dependent Quality of Life Questionnaire (MacDQoL) and underwent vision measurements. For test-retest reliability, a subset of 19 participants completed the MacTSQ twice, two weeks apart. Stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of treatment satisfaction. Change in MacTSQ scores over time was assessed on 83 patients who completed the MacTSQ at a follow-up visit, one year later.
resultsThe intraclass correlation coefficients between the first and second test-retest administration ranged from 0.88 to 0.98 for the items and total score. Internal reliability of the total score was adequate (Cronbach's a = 0.837). Principal component analysis revealed three subscales (effectiveness, information provision and convenience, impact). The MacTSQ score showed significant correlations with SF-12 summary scales and MacDQoL scores (ρ = 0.16-0.27). The most important factor that determined the satisfaction was mental health. Distance visual acuity (VA) in better eye was the best predictor of the effectiveness subscale, and the total number of injections was a negative predictor for the convenience subscale. Treatment satisfaction increased at one-year follow-up, despite the deterioration in distance VA.
conclusionsThe Greek MacTSQ is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing nAMD patients' perceptions of treatment satisfaction, especially using its three new subscales. Treatment satisfaction is multifactorial and was primarily determined by patients' mental health status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.