ArticleEndocrine2017
Growth hormone and cortisol secretion in the elderly evaluated using the glucagon stimulation test.
Article in Endocrine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The history of an effective, specific and sensitive diagnostic test: the GHRH test in clinical practice.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2025Review
- Once upon a time: the glucagon stimulation test in diagnosing adult GH deficiency.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024Review
- Anterior pituitary hormone dysfunction among individuals with complete heart block requiring pacemaker.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and testing for growth hormone deficiency across the ages: a global view of the accuracy, caveats, and cut-offs for diagnosis.Endocrine connections · 2023Review
- Investigation of the Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis: a contemporary synthesis.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2021Review
- Glucagon stimulation test: has its time come?Endocrine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe glucagon stimulation test is a reliable alternative test to assess growth hormone and cortisol secretion, but has not been widely used in the elderly population. The aim of this study was to evaluate growth hormone and cortisol secretion using the glucagon stimulation test in an elderly population without known hypothalamic-pituitary disease and to correlate growth hormone and cortisol peaks with age (less than or greater than 80 years) and body mass index.
methodsForty-two subjects (67-88 years) from the geriatric ambulatory unit were submitted and 41 subjects completed the glucagon stimulation test.
resultsMedian growth hormone peak was 5.99 μg/L and median cortisol peak was 21.6 μg/dL. Growth hormone peak was >3 µg/L in 73.2%, and cortisol peak was >18 µg/dL in 65.8% of patients. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the growth hormone peak and the cortisol peak. The cortisol peak was significantly different between subjects stratified by growth hormone peak of < or >3 μg/L (15.7 and 21.8 μg/dL, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in cortisol peak according to age < or > 80 years (22.4 and 18.5 µg/dL, respectively). Considering lower cut-offs recently proposed for growth hormone peak (1.0 μg/L for overweight subjects) and cortisol peak (9.1 μg/dL), only two patients had a growth hormone peak below this value, and all patients had preserved cortisol secretion.
conclusionsWe did find a positive correlation between growth hormone and cortisol peaks in the glucagon stimulation test in the elderly, confirming the capacity of the glucagon stimulation test to stimulate both axes. According to the new proposed cut-points for growth hormone and cortisol, we had 95% of normal growth hormone and 100% of normal cortisol responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.