Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28285070›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of medicine2017

Time to Clinically Relevant Fracture Risk Scores in Postmenopausal Women.

Margaret L Gourlay, Robert A Overman, Jason P Fine, Carolyn J Crandall, John Robbins, John T Schousboe, Kristine E Ensrud, Erin S LeBlanc, Margery L Gass, Karen C Johnson and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recommendations on screening for primary prevention of fragility fractures.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  6. Current Status of the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret L GourlayDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Electronic address: margaret_gourlay@med.unc.edu.
Robert A OvermanDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Jason P FineDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Carolyn J CrandallDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
John RobbinsDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California at Davis, Sacramento.
John T SchousboeDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Kristine E EnsrudDepartment of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Medicine, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minn.
Erin S LeBlancCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Ore.
Margery L GassCleveland, Ohio.
Karen C JohnsonDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
Catherine R WomackDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
Andrea Z LaCroixDivision of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of California at San Diego.
Women's Health Initiative Investigators
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

UNC Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000083 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2012 to 2013
$11.6M
Secondary Analyses of Osteoporosis Screening in Older MenR01AG046294 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GOURLAY, MARGARET L · 2014 to 2016
$837k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000083NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100046CNIA NIH HHS HHSN271201100004CNIA NIH HHS R01 AG046294WHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical practice guidelines recommend use of fracture risk scores for screening and pharmacologic treatment decisions. The timing of occurrence of treatment-level (according to 2014 National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines) or screening-level (according to 2011 US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines) fracture risk scores has not been estimated in postmenopausal women.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective competing risk analysis of new occurrence of treatment-level and screening-level fracture risk scores in postmenopausal women aged 50 years and older, prior to receipt of pharmacologic treatment and prior to first hip or clinical vertebral fracture.

resultsIn 54,280 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 64 years without a bone mineral density test, the time for 10% to develop a treatment-level FRAX score could not be estimated accurately because of rare incidence of treatment-level scores. In 6096 women who had FRAX scores calculated with bone mineral density, the estimated unadjusted time to treatment-level FRAX ranged from 7.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6-8.7) for those aged 65 to 69, to 5.1 years (95% CI, 3.5-7.5) for those aged 75 to 79 at baseline. Of 17,967 women aged 50 to 64 with a screening-level FRAX at baseline, 100 (0.6%) experienced a hip or clinical vertebral fracture by age 65 years.

conclusionsPostmenopausal women with sub-threshold fracture risk scores at baseline were unlikely to develop a treatment-level FRAX score between ages 50 and 64 years. After age 65, the increased incidence of treatment-level fracture risk scores, osteoporosis, and major osteoporotic fracture supports more frequent consideration of FRAX and bone mineral density testing.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTime FactorsBone densityFracturesMenopausalOsteoporosis/epidemiologyRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID28285070
PMCPMC5474146
OpenAlexW2594145424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.