Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28284849›Full record

ReviewCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2017

Attention to pain! A neurocognitive perspective on attentional modulation of pain in neuroimaging studies.

D M Torta, V Legrain, A Mouraux, E Valentini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fibromyalgia: A Multifactorial Pain Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D M TortaInstitute of Neuroscience, Cognitive and System Neuroscience (COSY) Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: diana.torta@uclouvain.be.
V LegrainInstitute of Neuroscience, Cognitive and System Neuroscience (COSY) Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
A MourauxInstitute of Neuroscience, Cognitive and System Neuroscience (COSY) Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
E ValentiniDepartment of Psychology and Centre for Brain Science, University of Essex, England, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 336130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have used neuroimaging techniques to investigate brain correlates of the attentional modulation of pain. Although these studies have advanced the knowledge in the field, important confounding factors such as imprecise theoretical definitions of attention, incomplete operationalization of the construct under exam, and limitations of techniques relying on measuring regional changes in cerebral blood flow have hampered the potential relevance of the conclusions. Here, we first provide an overview of the major theories of attention and of attention in the study of pain to bridge theory and experimental results. We conclude that load and motivational/affective theories are particularly relevant to study the attentional modulation of pain and should be carefully integrated in functional neuroimaging studies. Then, we summarize previous findings and discuss the possible neural correlates of the attentional modulation of pain. We discuss whether classical functional neuroimaging techniques are suitable to measure the effect of a fluctuating process like attention, and in which circumstances functional neuroimaging can be reliably used to measure the attentional modulation of pain. Finally, we argue that the analysis of brain networks and spontaneous oscillations may be a crucial future development in the study of attentional modulation of pain, and why the interplay between attention and pain, as examined so far, may rely on neural mechanisms shared with other sensory modalities.

Indexed as

AttentionBrainHumansNeuroimagingPainPain PerceptionAttentionBottom-up attentionBrain networksNeuroimagingPainTop-down attention

Identifiers

PMID28284849
PMCPMC7617013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.