Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28284227›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2017

The association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and maternal human papillomavirus infection: a systematic review protocol.

Joseph Niyibizi, Nadège Zanré, Marie-Hélène Mayrand, Helen Trottier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Impact of HPV infection on vaginal microecology and maternal and neonatal outcomes.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Paediatric virology and human papillomaviruses: An update.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph NiyibiziDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Pavilion 7101, Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC, H3N 1X7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5983-6115
Nadège ZanréDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Centre of University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM) and University of Montreal, Tour Saint-Antoine, 850, rue St-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Marie-Hélène MayrandDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Pavilion 7101, Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC, H3N 1X7, Canada.
Helen TrottierDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Pavilion 7101, Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC, H3N 1X7, Canada. helen.trottier@umontreal.ca.

Funding

CIHR MOP-136833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is the most prevalent genital infection, especially in young women of reproductive age. In vitro and animal model experiments provide compelling evidence of the harmful effect of HPV on pregnancy outcomes, but results from epidemiologic studies are inconclusive. We aim to determine the strength of the relationship between adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) and HPV infection and assess its consistency across studies, by systematically reviewing the literature.

methodsThe search strategy has been developed on the basis of the PICOS framework: Population (pregnant women); Exposure (HVP infection confirmed by HPV testing); Comparator (pregnant women without HPV infection); Outcomes (miscarriage, spontaneous preterm birth, low birth weight, preterm premature rupture of membranes, pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders and intrauterine growth restriction) and Study design (observational studies). We will search three information sources: (1) electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EBM Reviews databases); (2) Grey literature (Google Scholar and Web of Science conference proceedings); and (3) citing and cited articles of included studies. Two reviewers (JN, NZ) will independently and in duplicate screen identified articles, select eligible studies, and extract data. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus and otherwise by discussion with the other authors (MHM, HT). Quality of included studies will be assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. We will narratively synthesize extracted data whether meta-analysis is conducted or not. Meta-analysis of each outcome will be performed, and where appropriate, an average measure of association will be computed. We will use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess and grade the strength of confidence in cumulative estimate. DISCUSSION: Comprehensive and high-quality evidence of a negative effect of HPV on pregnancy outcomes might be an additional motivation for HPV vaccination. Absence of such relationship could dispel anxiety and reassure HPV-infected pregnant women and clinicians. Findings of a poor level of confidence will allow identification of current knowledge gaps on HPV-pregnancy outcome relationship that need further research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016033425.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeSystematic Reviews as TopicFemaleHumansPapillomavirus InfectionsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAdverse pregnancy outcomesHuman papillomavirusPregnant womenProtocolSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28284227
PMCPMC5346269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.