Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28284203›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2017

Factors associated with cervical cancer screening participation among immigrants of Russian, Somali and Kurdish origin: a population-based study in Finland.

Esther E Idehen, Tellervo Korhonen, Anu Castaneda, Teppo Juntunen, Mari Kangasniemi, Anna-Maija Pietilä, Päivikki Koponen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Esther E IdehenInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistoranta 1, P. O. Box 1627, 7021, Kuopio, Finland. estheri@uef.fi.
Tellervo KorhonenInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistoranta 1, P. O. Box 1627, 7021, Kuopio, Finland.
Anu CastanedaDepartment of Welfare, Equality and Inclusion Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Teppo JuntunenDepartment of Welfare, Equality and Inclusion Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Mari KangasniemiDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Anna-Maija PietiläDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Päivikki KoponenDepartment of Public Health Solutions, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies revealed low participation in cervical cancer screening among immigrants compared with non-immigrants. Only a few studies about factors associated with immigrants' lower participation rates have been conducted in European countries that have universal access for all eligible women. Our study aimed to explore factors associated with cervical screening participation among women of Russian, Somali, and Kurdish origin in Finland.

methodsWe used data from the Migrant Health and Well-being Survey, 2010-2012. Structured face-to-face interviews of groups of immigrants aged 25-60 yielded 620 responses concerning screening participation in the previous five years. Statistical analysis employed logistic regression.

resultsThe age-adjusted participation rates were as follows: among women of Russian origin 73.9% (95% CI 68.1-79.7), for Somalis 34.7% (95% CI 26.4-43.0), and for Kurds 61.3% (95% CI 55.0-67.7). Multiple logistic regressions showed that the most significant factor increasing the likelihood of screening participation among all groups was having had at least one gynecological check-up in the previous five years (Odds ratio [OR] = 6.54-26.2; p < 0.001). Other factors were higher education (OR = 2.63; p = 0.014), being employed (OR = 4.31; p = 0.007), and having given birth (OR = 9.34; p = 0.014), among Kurds; and literacy in Finnish/Swedish (OR = 3.63; p = 0.003) among Russians.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that women who refrain from using reproductive health services, those who are unemployed and less educated, as well as those with poor language proficiency, might need more information on the importance of screening participation. Primary and occupational healthcare services may have a significant role in informing immigrant women about this importance.

Indexed as

AdultEarly Detection of CancerEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleFinlandHumansIranIraqLogistic ModelsMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRussiaSomaliaSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancerEarly detectionFinlandImmigrantsPap testScreening participation

Identifiers

PMID28284203
PMCPMC5346186
OpenAlexW2593495926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.