Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28284192›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

MOST: most-similar ligand based approach to target prediction.

Tao Huang, Hong Mi, Cheng-Yuan Lin, Ling Zhao, Linda L D Zhong, Feng-Bin Liu, Ge Zhang, Ai-Ping Lu, Zhao-Xiang Bian, for MZRW Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A platform for target prediction of phenotypic screening hit molecules.Journal of molecular graphics & modelling · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Predicted Biological Activity of Purchasable Chemical Space.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2018
    Article
  16. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tao HuangLab of Brain and Gut Research, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, 7 Baptist University Road, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Hong MiLab of Brain and Gut Research, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, 7 Baptist University Road, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Cheng-Yuan LinLab of Brain and Gut Research, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, 7 Baptist University Road, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Ling ZhaoLab of Brain and Gut Research, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, 7 Baptist University Road, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Linda L D ZhongLab of Brain and Gut Research, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, 7 Baptist University Road, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Feng-Bin LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510405, People's Republic of China.
Ge ZhangLab of Brain and Gut Research, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, 7 Baptist University Road, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Ai-Ping LuLab of Brain and Gut Research, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, 7 Baptist University Road, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Zhao-Xiang BianLab of Brain and Gut Research, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, 7 Baptist University Road, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. bianzxiang@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3130-8417
for MZRW Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany computational approaches have been used for target prediction, including machine learning, reverse docking, bioactivity spectra analysis, and chemical similarity searching. Recent studies have suggested that chemical similarity searching may be driven by the most-similar ligand. However, the extent of bioactivity of most-similar ligands has been oversimplified or even neglected in these studies, and this has impaired the prediction power.

resultsHere we propose the MOst-Similar ligand-based Target inference approach, namely MOST, which uses fingerprint similarity and explicit bioactivity of the most-similar ligands to predict targets of the query compound. Performance of MOST was evaluated by using combinations of different fingerprint schemes, machine learning methods, and bioactivity representations. In sevenfold cross-validation with a benchmark Ki dataset from CHEMBL release 19 containing 61,937 bioactivity data of 173 human targets, MOST achieved high average prediction accuracy (0.95 for pKi ≥ 5, and 0.87 for pKi ≥ 6). Morgan fingerprint was shown to be slightly better than FP2. Logistic Regression and Random Forest methods performed better than Naïve Bayes. In a temporal validation, the Ki dataset from CHEMBL19 were used to train models and predict the bioactivity of newly deposited ligands in CHEMBL20. MOST also performed well with high accuracy (0.90 for pKi ≥ 5, and 0.76 for pKi ≥ 6), when Logistic Regression and Morgan fingerprint were employed. Furthermore, the p values associated with explicit bioactivity were found be a robust index for removing false positive predictions. Implicit bioactivity did not offer this capability. Finally, p values generated with Logistic Regression, Morgan fingerprint and explicit activity were integrated with a false discovery rate (FDR) control procedure to reduce false positives in multiple-target prediction scenario, and the success of this strategy it was demonstrated with a case of fluanisone. In the case of aloe-emodin's laxative effect, MOST predicted that acetylcholinesterase was the mechanism-of-action target; in vivo studies validated this prediction.

conclusionsUsing the MOST approach can result in highly accurate and robust target prediction. Integrated with a FDR control procedure, MOST provides a reliable framework for multiple-target inference. It has prospective applications in drug repurposing and mechanism-of-action target prediction.

Indexed as

LigandsMachine LearningAcetylcholinesteraseAloeAnimalsCatharticsDatabases, ChemicalEmodinHumansKineticsLogistic ModelsAcetylcholinesteraseCatharticsEmodinLigandsExplicit bioactivityFalse discovery rateLogistic regressionMechanism-of-action targetMost-similar ligandTarget prediction

Identifiers

PMID28284192
PMCPMC5346209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.