ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
MOST: most-similar ligand based approach to target prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Optimizing drug design by merging generative AI with a physics-based active learning framework.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
- Fifteen years of ChEMBL and its role in cheminformatics and drug discovery.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Review
- Step Forward Cross Validation for Bioactivity Prediction: Out of Distribution Validation in Drug Discovery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Prediction of compound-target interaction using several artificial intelligence algorithms and comparison with a consensus-based strategy.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- Using Generative Modeling to Endow with Potency Initially Inert Compounds with Good Bioavailability and Low Toxicity.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- MIFNN: Molecular Information Feature Extraction and Fusion Deep Neural Network for Screening Potential Drugs.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Article
- De Novo Prediction of Drug Targets and Candidates by Chemical Similarity-Guided Network-Based Inference.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Bioactivity Comparison across Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms Using over 5000 Datasets for Drug Discovery.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Computational/in silico methods in drug target and lead prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Review
- A platform for target prediction of phenotypic screening hit molecules.Journal of molecular graphics & modelling · 2020Article
- Associating 197 Chinese herbal medicine with drug targets and diseases using the similarity ensemble approach.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2020Article
- Error Tolerance of Machine Learning Algorithms across Contemporary Biological Targets.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Machine learning in chemoinformatics and drug discovery.Drug discovery today · 2018Review
- Predicted Biological Activity of Purchasable Chemical Space.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2018Article
- Article
- Uncovering the Mechanisms of Chinese Herbal Medicine (MaZiRenWan) for Functional Constipation by Focused Network Pharmacology Approach.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- Approaches in studying the pharmacology of Chinese Medicine formulas: bottom-up, top-down-and meeting in the middle.Chinese medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany computational approaches have been used for target prediction, including machine learning, reverse docking, bioactivity spectra analysis, and chemical similarity searching. Recent studies have suggested that chemical similarity searching may be driven by the most-similar ligand. However, the extent of bioactivity of most-similar ligands has been oversimplified or even neglected in these studies, and this has impaired the prediction power.
resultsHere we propose the MOst-Similar ligand-based Target inference approach, namely MOST, which uses fingerprint similarity and explicit bioactivity of the most-similar ligands to predict targets of the query compound. Performance of MOST was evaluated by using combinations of different fingerprint schemes, machine learning methods, and bioactivity representations. In sevenfold cross-validation with a benchmark Ki dataset from CHEMBL release 19 containing 61,937 bioactivity data of 173 human targets, MOST achieved high average prediction accuracy (0.95 for pKi ≥ 5, and 0.87 for pKi ≥ 6). Morgan fingerprint was shown to be slightly better than FP2. Logistic Regression and Random Forest methods performed better than Naïve Bayes. In a temporal validation, the Ki dataset from CHEMBL19 were used to train models and predict the bioactivity of newly deposited ligands in CHEMBL20. MOST also performed well with high accuracy (0.90 for pKi ≥ 5, and 0.76 for pKi ≥ 6), when Logistic Regression and Morgan fingerprint were employed. Furthermore, the p values associated with explicit bioactivity were found be a robust index for removing false positive predictions. Implicit bioactivity did not offer this capability. Finally, p values generated with Logistic Regression, Morgan fingerprint and explicit activity were integrated with a false discovery rate (FDR) control procedure to reduce false positives in multiple-target prediction scenario, and the success of this strategy it was demonstrated with a case of fluanisone. In the case of aloe-emodin's laxative effect, MOST predicted that acetylcholinesterase was the mechanism-of-action target; in vivo studies validated this prediction.
conclusionsUsing the MOST approach can result in highly accurate and robust target prediction. Integrated with a FDR control procedure, MOST provides a reliable framework for multiple-target inference. It has prospective applications in drug repurposing and mechanism-of-action target prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.