Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28284177›Full record

SynthesisBosnian journal of basic medical sciences2017

Meta-analysis of interleukin 6, 8, and 10 between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass groups.

Fanbo Meng, Jianghong Ma, Wei Wang, Baisong Lin

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Risk factors and nutritional status analysis in patients with liver cirrhosis and concomitant chronic periodontitis].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: 30 Years of Debate.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fanbo MengDepartment of Cardiology, China Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. fanbomeng63@126.com.
Jianghong Ma
Wei Wang
Baisong Lin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the role of off-pump coronary artery bypass (CAB) surgery on the decrease of postoperative inflammatory responses in patients. We systematically searched databases of PubMed and Embase to select the related studies. Interleukin (IL) 6, 8, and 10 were used as outcomes and pooled analysis was performed using R 3.12 software. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were considered as effect estimates. A total of 27 studies, including 1340 participants, were recruited in this meta-analysis. The pooled analyses showed that postoperative concentration of IL-10 at 12 hours was significantly lower in off-pump CAB group compared to on-pump CAB group (SMD = -1.3640, 95% CI = -2.0086--0.7193). However, no significant differences were found in pre and postoperative concentrations of IL-6 and 8 between off-pump and on-pump CAB groups. These results suggest that there is no advantage of off-pump CAB surgery in the reduction of inflammation compared to on-pump CAB surgery.

Indexed as

AgedCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery Bypass, Off-PumpCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansInflammationInterleukin-10Interleukin-6Interleukin-8Middle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodTime FactorsCXCL8 protein, humanIL10 protein, humanIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-10Interleukin-6Interleukin-8

Identifiers

PMID28284177
PMCPMC5474113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.