ArticleJournal of medical systems2017
Decision Support System for Detection of Papilledema through Fundus Retinal Images.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Ophthalmic Imaging: A Narrative Approach.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Detection of Papilledema: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnosis of High Intracranial Pressure by Non-Optic Nerve Retinal Image Features.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Practical Applications, Subspecialty Evidence and Real-World Deployment.Cureus · 2025Review
- Differentiation of optic disc edema and pseudopapilledema with deep learning on near-infrared reflectance images.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: A systematic review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Implications of Celiac Disease in Prospective Corneal Refractive Surgery Patients: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- A clinical decision support system for diagnosing and determining severity of dry eye disease.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of Optic Disc Oedema: Fundus Features, Ocular Imaging Findings, and Artificial Intelligence.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2023Review
- [Etiologies of papilledema in Cameroonian hospitals].The Pan African medical journal · 2023Article
- Lipid Nanoparticles for the Posterior Eye Segment.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- [Diagnostics of diseases of the optic nerve head in times of artificial intelligence and big data].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Review
- Detection of Optic Disc Abnormalities in Color Fundus Photographs Using Deep Learning.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2021Article
- Data on fundus images for vessels segmentation, detection of hypertensive retinopathy, diabetic retinopathy and papilledema.Data in brief · 2020Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence to Differentiate Pediatric Pseudopapilledema and True Papilledema on Fundus Photographs.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- The use of artificial intelligence in detecting papilledema from fundus photographs.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A condition in which the optic nerve inside the eye is swelled due to increased intracranial pressure is known as papilledema. The abnormalities due to papilledema such as opacification of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL), dilated optic disc capillaries, blurred disc margins, absence of venous pulsations, elevation of optic disc, obscuration of optic disc vessels, dilation of optic disc veins, optic disc splinter hemorrhages, cotton wool spots and hard exudates may result in complete vision loss. The ophthalmologists detect papilledema by means of an ophthalmoscope, Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and ultrasound. Rapid development of computer aided diagnostic systems has revolutionized the world. There is a need to develop such type of system that automatically detects the papilledema. In this paper, an automated system is presented that detects and grades the papilledema through analysis of fundus retinal images. The proposed system extracts 23 features from which six textural features are extracted from Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), eight features from optic disc margin obscuration, three color based features and seven vascular features are extracted. A feature vector consisting of these features is used for classification of normal and papilledema images using Support Vector Machine (SVM) with Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel. The variations in retinal blood vessels, color properties, texture deviation of optic disc and its peripapillary region, and fluctuation of obscured disc margin are effectively identified and used by the proposed system for the detection and grading of papilledema. A dataset of 160 fundus retinal images is used which is taken from publicly available STARE database and local dataset collected from Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology (AFIO) Pakistan. The proposed system shows an average accuracy of 92.86% for classification of papilledema and normal images. It also shows an average accuracy of 97.85% for classification of already classified papilledema images into mild and severe papilledema. The proposed system is a novel step towards automated detection and grading of papilledema. The results showed that the technique is reliable and can be used as clinical decision support system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.