Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28283938›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2017

Seasonal variation in Internet searches for vitamin D.

Rebecca J Moon, Elizabeth M Curtis, Justin H Davies, Cyrus Cooper, Nicholas C Harvey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Knowledge about Vitamin D among General Population in Baghdad City.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Determinants of Vitamin D Supplementation among Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Seasonality of bruxism: evidence from Google Trends.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2019
    Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca J MoonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Elizabeth M CurtisMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Justin H DaviesPaediatric Endocrinology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Nicholas C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. nch@mrc.soton.ac.uk.
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 17702Arthritis Research UK 21231Department of Health 10/33/04Department of Health HTA/10/33/04Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Versus Arthritis 17702Versus Arthritis 21231Wellcome Trust 201222/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internet search rates for "vitamin D" were explored using Google Trends. Search rates increased from 2004 until 2010 and thereafter displayed a seasonal pattern peaking in late winter. This knowledge could help guide the timing of public health interventions aimed at managing vitamin D deficiency. PURPOSE: The Internet is an important source of health information. Analysis of Internet search activity rates can provide information on disease epidemiology, health related behaviors and public interest. We explored Internet search rates for vitamin D to determine whether this reflects the increasing scientific interest in this topic.

methodsGoogle Trends is a publically available tool that provides data on Internet searches using Google. Search activity for the term "vitamin D" from 1st January 2004 until 31st October 2016 was obtained. Comparison was made to other bone and nutrition related terms.

resultsWorldwide, searches for "vitamin D" increased from 2004 until 2010 and thereafter a statistically significant (p < 0.001) seasonal pattern with a peak in February and nadir in August was observed. This seasonal pattern was evident for searches originating from both the USA (peak in February) and Australia (peak in August); p < 0.001 for both. Searches for the terms "osteoporosis", "rickets", "back pain" or "folic acid" did not display the increase observed for vitamin D or evidence of seasonal variation.

conclusionPublic interest in vitamin D, as assessed by Internet search activity, did increase from 2004 to 2010, likely reflecting the growing scientific interest, but now displays a seasonal pattern with peak interest during late winter. This information could be used to guide public health approaches to managing vitamin D deficiency.

Indexed as

SeasonsVitamin DAustraliaHumansInternetSearch EngineUnited StatesVitamin DEpidemiologyGoogle TrendsInternetVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID28283938
PMCPMC5346128
OpenAlexW2592343852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.