Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28283917›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2017

Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer.

G Cicero, R De Luca, P Dorangricchia, G Lo Coco, C Guarnaccia, D Fanale, V Calò, A Russo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Psychological aspects, risk and protective factors related to BRCA genetic testing: a review of the literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Use of NCCN distress thermometer in cancer genetics patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How does genetic testing influence anxiety, depression, and quality of life? A hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome suspects trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

G CiceroDepartment of Surgical, Oncology and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, n. 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy. giuseppe.cicero@unipa.it.
R De LucaDepartment of Surgical, Oncology and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, n. 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
P DorangricchiaDepartment of Surgical, Oncology and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, n. 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
G Lo CocoDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
C GuarnacciaLaboratoire Parisien de Psychologie Sociale, Université Paris 8 Vincennes Saint Denis, Saint Denis, France.
D FanaleDepartment of Surgical, Oncology and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, n. 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
V CalòDepartment of Surgical, Oncology and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, n. 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
A RussoDepartment of Surgical, Oncology and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, n. 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncological Genetic Counselling (CGO) allows the identification of a genetic component that increases the risk of developing a cancer. Individuals' psychological reactions are influenced by both the content of the received information and the subjective perception of their own risk of becoming ill or being a carrier of a genetic mutation. This study included 120 participants who underwent genetic counselling for breast and/or ovarian cancer. The aim of the study was to examine the relation between their cancer risk perception and the genetic risk during CGO before receiving genetic test results, considering the influence of some psychological variables, in particular distress, anxiety and depression. Participants completed the following tools during a psychological interview: a socio-demographic form, Cancer Risk Perception (CRP) and Genetic Risk Perception (GRP), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Distress Thermometer (DT). The data seem to confirm our hypothesis. Positive and significant correlations were found between the observed variables. Moreover, genetic risk perception determined an increase in depressive symptomatology and cancer risk perception led to an increase in anxious symptomatology, specifically in participants during cancer treatment. The present results suggest the importance of assessing genetic and cancer risk perception in individuals who undergo CGO, to identify those who are at risk of a decrease in psychological well-being and of developing greater psychological distress.

Indexed as

AdultAnxietyBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedMutationOvarian NeoplasmsPerceptionRisk FactorsStress, PsychologicalBRCA 1/2Cancer risk perceptionDistressGenetic counsellingGenetic risk perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.