Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28283872›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2017

Screening food-borne and zoonotic pathogens associated with livestock practices in the Sumapaz region, Cundinamarca, Colombia.

Nelson E Arenas, Diego A Abril, Paola Valencia, Surabhi Khandige, Carlos Yesid Soto, Vilma Moreno-Melo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Veterinary world · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. In Silico Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Integrons inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nelson E ArenasFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de Cundinamarca, Diagonal 18 No. 20-29, Fusagasugá, Cundinamarca, 252211, Colombia.
Diego A AbrilFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de Cundinamarca, Diagonal 18 No. 20-29, Fusagasugá, Cundinamarca, 252211, Colombia.
Paola ValenciaFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de Cundinamarca, Diagonal 18 No. 20-29, Fusagasugá, Cundinamarca, 252211, Colombia.
Surabhi KhandigeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Carlos Yesid SotoDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30, No. 45-03, Ciudad Universitaria, Bogotá, Colombia.
Vilma Moreno-MeloFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de Cundinamarca, Diagonal 18 No. 20-29, Fusagasugá, Cundinamarca, 252211, Colombia. vilma@mail.unicundi.edu.co.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hazardous practices regarding antibiotics misuse, unsanitary milking procedures, and the commercial sales of raw milk and unpasteurized dairy products are currently being practiced by livestock farmers in the Sumapaz region (Colombia). The purpose of this study was to screen for food-borne and zoonotic pathogens associated with local livestock practices. We evaluated 1098 cows from 46 livestock farms in the Sumapaz region that were selected by random. Of the total population of cattle, 962 animals (88%) were tested for bovine TB using a caudal-fold tuberculin test and 546 (50%) for brucellosis by a competitive ELISA. In the population tested, 23 cows were positive for Brucella sp. representing a 4.2% seroprevalence and no cases of bovine tuberculosis were found. In addition, food-borne contamination with Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus was assessed together with antibiotic susceptibility for ten different antibiotics in milk samples from 16 livestock farms. We found that 12 of the farms (75%) were contaminated with these food-borne pathogens. Noteworthy, all of the isolated pathogenic strains were resistant to multiple antibiotics, primarily to oxytetracycline and erythromycin. Our findings suggest that livestock products could be a source of exposure to Brucella and multidrug-resistant E. coli and S. aureus strains as a result of unhygienic livestock practices in the Sumapaz region. Training in good farming practices is the key to improving safety in food production.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBrucellaBrucellosisCattleColombiaCommunity ParticipationCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliFarmersFemaleFoodborne DiseasesFood ContaminationMass ScreeningMilkAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceBovine brucellosisBovine tuberculosisEscherichia coliStaphylococcus aureusZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID28283872
PMCPMC5375959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.