Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28283838›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2017

The effect of NSAIDs on spinal fusion: a cross-disciplinary review of biochemical, animal, and human studies.

Ahilan Sivaganesan, Silky Chotai, Gabrielle White-Dzuro, Matthew J McGirt, Clinton J Devin

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Life satisfaction and pain interference in spine surgery patients before and after surgery: comparison between on-opioid and opioid-naïve patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Trial
  3. An Update on Pain Management in Pediatric Spine Surgery.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effectiveness of Corticosteroid Therapy in Enhancing Early Postoperative Recovery in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahilan SivaganesanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave. So., T4224 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN, 37232-2380, USA. ahilan.sivaganesan@vanderbilt.edu.
Silky ChotaiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave. So., T4224 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN, 37232-2380, USA.
Gabrielle White-DzuroVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Matthew J McGirtDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Clinton J DevinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave. So., T4224 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN, 37232-2380, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) play an important role in postoperative pain management. However, their use in the setting of spine fusion surgery setting has long been a topic of controversy. In this review we examined relevant research, including in vivo, animal, and clinical human studies, with the aim of understanding the effect of NSAIDs on spinal fusion. STUDY DESIGN/

settingSystematic review of study designs of all types from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to single-institution retrospective reviews.

methodsA search of PubMed and Embase was conducted using the keywords: "spine," "spinal fracture," NSAIDs, anti-inflammatory non-steroidal agents, bone, bone healing, fracture, fracture healing, yielding a total of 110 studies. Other 28 studies were identified by cross-referencing, resulting in total 138 studies.

resultsThere is no level I evidence from human studies regarding the use of NSAIDs on spinal fusion rates. The overall tone of the spine literature in the early 2000s was that NSAIDs increased the rate of non-union; however, nearly all human studies published after 2005 suggest that short-term (<2 weeks) postoperative use have no such effect. The dose dependency that is seen with a 2-week postoperative course is not present when NSAIDs are only used for 48 h after surgery.

conclusionsNSAID appear to have dose-dependent and duration-dependent effects on fusion rates. The short-term use of low-dose NSAIDs around the time of spinal fusion surgery is reasonable. Spine surgeons can consider the incorporation of NSAIDs into pain control regimens for spinal fusion patients with the goal of improving pain control and reducing the costs and complications associated with opioids.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnimalsFracture HealingHumansPostoperative PainSpinal FracturesSpinal FusionTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDoseDurationFusionNSAIDSpineSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.