Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28283831›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Patient satisfaction in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) unit practising predominantly self-administration of antibiotics with elastomeric pumps.

L Saillen, L Arensdorff, E Moulin, R Voumard, C Cochet, N Boillat-Blanco, C Gardiol, S de Vallière

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Open forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

L SaillenDepartment of Surgery, Hôpital intercantonal de la Broye, 1530, Payerne, Switzerland.
L ArensdorffDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Av du Bugnon 44, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
E MoulinInfectious Diseases Service, University Hospital of Lausanne, Av du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
R VoumardDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Av du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
C CochetTreatment and Rehabilitation Center, Gilly Hospital, 1182, Gilly, Switzerland.
N Boillat-BlancoDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Av du Bugnon 44, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
C GardiolDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Av du Bugnon 44, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
S de VallièreDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Av du Bugnon 44, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. serge.de-valliere@hospvd.ch.
University of Lausanne · CHHôpital intercantonal de la Broye · CHMercy Hospital · USUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-administration of antibiotics using elastomeric pumps has become the most frequently used treatment modality at the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) unit of the University Hospital of Lausanne. However, it remains unknown how comfortable patients feel using this mode of treatment. A questionnaire was offered to all patients treated at the OPAT unit between June 2014 and December 2015. The questionnaire was distributed to 188 patients and 112 questionnaires were returned. Seventy-one patients were treated by self-administration, 21 attended the OPAT unit on a daily basis, and 20 received their antibiotics from home-care nurses. Overall, 83-97% of the patients gave the highest possible scores to the four items evaluating their global satisfaction. Subjects treated by self-administration gave a significantly better rating to 6 of the 17 semi-quantitative questions than the patients treated at the OPAT unit or by home-care nurses. There was no item which was more poorly rated by patients treated by self-administered OPAT than by the other treatment groups. In conclusion satisfaction was high in all patients treated by OPAT. The particularly high satisfaction of patients treated by self-administration of antibiotics with elastomeric pumps suggests that a significant number of patients are happy to take over some responsibility for their treatment. Patients' capacity to appropriate their care themselves should not be underestimated by health care professionals.

Indexed as

OutpatientsPatient SatisfactionAdministration, IntravenousAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf AdministrationSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID28283831
OpenAlexW2592112952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.