Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28283805›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

An evidence-based stress management intervention for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant caregivers: development, feasibility and acceptability.

Teresa L Simoneau, Kristin Kilbourn, Janet Spradley, Mark L Laudenslager

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa L SimoneauVA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, 1020 Johnson Rd., Golden, CO, 80401, USA. teresa.simoneau@va.gov.
Kristin KilbournDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Janet SpradleyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Mark L LaudenslagerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · US

Funding

Psychoeducation for BMT caregivers: Biobehavioral markers and outcomeR01CA126971 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LAUDENSLAGER, MARK L. · 2008 to 2012
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA126971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCaregivers of cancer patients face challenges impacting their physical, psychological and social well-being that need attention in the form of well-designed and tested interventions. We created an eight-session individual stress management intervention for caregivers of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Allo-HSCT) recipients. This intervention, tested by randomized control trial, proved effective in decreasing distress. Herein, we describe the intervention including theoretical framework, development, and elements of fidelity. Implementation challenges along with recommendations for refinement in future studies are discussed with the goal of replication and dissemination.

methodsSeventy-four of 148 caregivers received stress management training following randomization. The intervention occurred during the 100-day post-transplant period when caregivers are required. The training provided integrated cognitive behavioral strategies, psychoeducation, and problem-solving skills building as well as use of a biofeedback device.

resultsSeventy percent of caregivers completed all eight sessions indicating good acceptability for the in-person intervention; however, most caregivers did not reliably use the biofeedback device. The most common reason for drop-out was their patient becoming gravely ill or patient death. Few caregivers dropped out because of study demands. The need for flexibility in providing intervention sessions was key to retention.

conclusionOur evidence-based stress management intervention for Allo-HSCT caregivers was feasible. Variability in acceptability and challenges in implementation are discussed and suggestions for refinement of the intervention are outlined. Dissemination efforts could improve by using alternative methods for providing caregiver support such as telephone or video chat to accommodate caregivers who are unable to attend in-person sessions.

Indexed as

CaregiversFeasibility StudiesFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleNeoplasmsStress, PsychologicalTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HomologousCancerCaregiverInterventionOncologyStress management

Identifiers

PMID28283805
OpenAlexW2592860393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.