Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28283764›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017

Mental practice with interactive 3D visual aids enhances surgical performance.

Marina Yiasemidou, Daniel Glassman, Faisal Mushtaq, Christos Athanasiou, Mark-Mon Williams, David Jayne, Danilo Miskovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Operating list composition and surgical performance.The British journal of surgery · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marina YiasemidouLeeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, St James University Hospital, Clinical Science Building, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. marinayiasemidou@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2599-4131
Daniel GlassmanSchool of Surgery, Health Education Yorkshire and the Humber, University of Leeds, Willow Terrace Road, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Faisal MushtaqSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Christos AthanasiouLeeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, St James University Hospital, Clinical Science Building, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Mark-Mon WilliamsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
David JayneLeeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, St James University Hospital, Clinical Science Building, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Danilo MiskovicLeeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, St James University Hospital, Clinical Science Building, Beckett street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that Mental Practice (MP) could be used to finesse surgical skills. However, MP is cognitively demanding and may be dependent on the ability of individuals to produce mental images. In this study, we hypothesised that the provision of interactive 3D visual aids during MP could facilitate surgical skill performance.

methods20 surgical trainees were case-matched to one of three different preparation methods prior to performing a simulated Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC). Two intervention groups underwent a 25-minute MP session; one with interactive 3D visual aids depicting the relevant surgical anatomy (3D-MP group, n = 5) and one without (MP-Only, n = 5). A control group (n = 10) watched a didactic video of a real LC. Scores relating to technical performance and safety were recorded by a surgical simulator.

resultsThe Control group took longer to complete the procedure relative to the 3D&MP condition (p = .002). The number of movements was also statistically different across groups (p = .001), with the 3D&MP group making fewer movements relative to controls (p = .001). Likewise, the control group moved further in comparison to the 3D&MP condition and the MP-Only condition (p = .004). No reliable differences were observed for safety metrics.

conclusionThese data provide evidence for the potential value of MP in improving performance. Furthermore, they suggest that 3D interactive visual aids during MP could potentially enhance performance, beyond the benefits of MP alone. These findings pave the way for future RCTs on surgical preparation and performance.

Indexed as

Audiovisual AidsClinical CompetenceModels, AnatomicPractice, PsychologicalCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicGeneral SurgeryHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalSimulation TrainingAnatomical modelsMental practiceSurgical training

Identifiers

PMID28283764
PMCPMC5636856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.