ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2017
Clinical and urodynamic assessment in patients with pelvic organ prolapse before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urinary Outcomes Following a Novel Reconstructive Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Long-term results of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: A clinical trial.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Trial
- Postoperative Reduction in Postvoid Residual Urine Volume May Be Associated With Bladder Capacity Decrease Rather Than an Increase in Tidal Voided Urine Volume in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Long-Term Outcomes.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Effect of Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- The Presence of Preoperative Urinary Incontinence Significantly Correlates With Postoperative Urinary Incontinence Following Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.International neurourology journal · 2025Article
- Is There a Role for Urodynamic Investigation in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Voiding urodynamics parameters for women with and without symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Article
- Letter to the editor: absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- A new method of adjusting mesh tension using cystoscopy during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Impact of preoperative urodynamics on women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- Sacrocolpopexy: Patient Outcomes Support the Use of Non-Crosslinked Acellular Dermal Matrix as an Alternative to the Synthetic Polypropylene Mesh.Journal of gynecologic surgery · 2019Article
- Urodynamic findings and functional outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Predictors of persistent stress urinary incontinence after transvaginal mesh repair.BMC women's health · 2018Article
- Severity of Cystocele and Risk Factors of Postoperative Stress Urinary Incontinence after Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisWe hypothesized that patient-reported urinary symptoms and urodynamic evaluation improve after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) despite deeper vesicovaginal space dissection.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of women with pelvic organ prolapse who underwent LSC from January 2013 to January 2016 in a tertiary center. Urinary function was clinically evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF), the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire- - Short Form 20 (PFDI-20). Urodynamic assessment was performed before and 6 months after surgery. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and the McNemar test were applied with p < 0.05 considered significant.
resultsA total of 155 patients were included in the study. Of these, 46 had urodynamic assessment before and after LSC. There were significant improvements after LSC in urodynamic storage phase parameters (higher volume at first desire, higher volume at strong desire, and larger bladder capacity) and voiding phase parameters (higher Q
conclusionsApart from increased stress urinary incontinence, there was an improvement in overall urinary function in terms of patient-reported symptoms and urodynamics, despite deep vesicovaginal space dissection. Hence, LSC is a viable surgical option for pelvic organ prolapse, restoring both level 1 and level 2 support without detrimental effects on urinary function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.