ArticleCancer research2017
A Model-Based Personalized Cancer Screening Strategy for Detecting Early-Stage Tumors Using Blood-Borne Biomarkers.
Article in Cancer research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-biomarkers encoding tumor-activatable minicircles with scaffold/matrix attachment region motif for sensitive and sustained blood and urine-based cancer detection.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- An Inflection Point in Cancer Protein Biomarkers: What was and What's Next.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023Article
- A hitchhiker's guide to cancer models.Trends in biotechnology · 2022Review
- Future of Digital Assays to Resolve Clinical Heterogeneity of Single Extracellular Vesicles.ACS nano · 2022Review
- Cancer Detection Using an Artificial Secretable MicroRNA Found in Blood and Urine.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Device Engineering and Computational Analysis for Characterization of Cell-Released Cancer Biomarkers.Cancers · 2022Review
- Synthetic biomarkers: a twenty-first century path to early cancer detection.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2021Review
- Minicircles for a two-step blood biomarker and PET imaging early cancer detection strategy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021Article
- Oncological Ligand-Target Binding Systems and Developmental Approaches for Cancer Theranostics.Molecular biotechnology · 2021Review
- Optimal Timing for Cancer Screening and Adaptive Surveillance Using Mathematical Modeling.Cancer research · 2021Article
- A mathematical model of tumor regression and recurrence after therapeutic oncogene inactivation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A mathematical model of ctDNA shedding predicts tumor detection size.Science advances · 2020Article
- Circulating tumor DNA as an early cancer detection tool.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2020Review
- The 2019 mathematical oncology roadmap.Physical biology · 2019Review
- A glassy carbon electrode modified with TiOMikrochimica acta · 2018Article
- Improving cancer detection through combinations of cancer and immune biomarkers: a modelling approach.Journal of translational medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An effective cancer blood biomarker screening strategy must distinguish aggressive from nonaggressive tumors at an early, intervenable time. However, for blood-based strategies to be useful, the quantity of biomarker shed into the blood and its relationship to tumor growth or progression must be validated. To study how blood biomarker levels correlate with early-stage viable tumor growth in a mouse model of human cancer, we monitored early tumor growth of engineered human ovarian cancer cells (A2780) implanted orthotopically into nude mice. Biomarker shedding was monitored by serial blood sampling, whereas tumor viability and volume were monitored by bioluminescence imaging and ultrasound imaging. From these metrics, we developed a mathematical model of cancer biomarker kinetics that accounts for biomarker shedding from tumor and healthy cells, biomarker entry into vasculature, biomarker elimination from plasma, and subject-specific tumor growth. We validated the model in a separate set of mice in which subject-specific tumor growth rates were accurately predicted. To illustrate clinical translation of this strategy, we allometrically scaled model parameters from mouse to human and used parameters for PSA shedding and prostate cancer. In this manner, we found that blood biomarker sampling data alone were capable of enabling the detection and discrimination of simulated aggressive (2-month tumor doubling time) and nonaggressive (18-month tumor doubling time) tumors as early as 7.2 months and 8.9 years before clinical imaging, respectively. Our model and screening strategy offers broad impact in their applicability to any solid cancer and associated biomarkers shed, thereby allowing a distinction between aggressive and nonaggressive tumors using blood biomarker sampling data alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.