Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28282961›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

Pedestrians in Traffic Environments: Ultrafine Particle Respiratory Doses.

Maurizio Manigrasso, Claudio Natale, Matteo Vitali, Carmela Protano, Pasquale Avino

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Personal Exposure to Fine Particles (PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. COVID-19 lockdown and particle exposure of road users.Journal of transport & health · 2021
    Article
  6. Indoor Air Quality Levels in Schools: Role of Student Activities and No Activities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exposure to Secondhand Tobacco Smoke at Airport Terminals.Journal of environmental and public health · 2019
    Article
  14. Sustainable Transportation and Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maurizio ManigrassoDepartment of Technological Innovations, National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work, Research Area, via Roberto Ferruzzi 38/40, I-00143 Rome, Italy. m.manigrasso@inail.it.
Claudio NataleDepartment of Technological Innovations, National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work, Research Area, via Roberto Ferruzzi 38/40, I-00143 Rome, Italy. claude92@hotmail.it.
Matteo VitaliDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy. matteo.vitali@uniroma1.it.
Carmela ProtanoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy. carmela.protano@uniroma1.it.
Pasquale AvinoDepartment of Technological Innovations, National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work, Research Area, via Roberto Ferruzzi 38/40, I-00143 Rome, Italy. avino@unimol.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particulate matter has recently received more attention than other pollutants. PM10 and PM2.5 have been primarily monitored, whereas scientists are focusing their studies on finer granulometric sizes due both to their high number concentration and their high penetration efficiency into the respiratory system. The purpose of this study is to investigate the population exposure to UltraFine Particles (UFP, submicrons in general) in outdoor environments. The particle number doses deposited into the respiratory system have been compared between healthy individuals and persons affected by Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Measurements were performed by means of Dust Track and Nanoscan analyzers. Forty minute walking trails through areas with different traffic densities in downtown Rome have been considered. Furthermore, particle respiratory doses have been estimated for persons waiting at a bus stop, near a traffic light, or along a high-traffic road, as currently occurs in a big city. Large differences have been observed between workdays and weekdays: on workdays, UFP number concentrations are much higher due to the strong contribution of vehicular exhausts. COPD-affected individuals receive greater doses than healthy individuals due to their higher respiratory rate.

Indexed as

Particle SizePedestriansAir PollutantsCitiesEnvironmental MonitoringHumansMaleParticulate MatterRomeVehicle EmissionsAir PollutantsParticulate MatterVehicle Emissionsautovehicular trafficCOPDdose depositionexposuregranulometric sizehuman respiratory tractnumber concentrationultraFine particlesurban airworkday

Identifiers

PMID28282961
PMCPMC5369124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.