Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28282814›Full record

ReviewJournal of Parkinson's disease2017

The Synucleinopathies: Twenty Years On.

Michel Goedert, Ross Jakes, Maria Grazia Spillantini

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 333 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
333citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

333 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Differential proteostasis imbalance and the molecular basis of distinct synucleinopathies and tauopathies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The α-synuclein proteostasis network and its translational applications in Parkinson's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

273 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michel GoedertMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Ross JakesMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Maria Grazia SpillantiniDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Clifford Allbutt Building, Cambridge, AH, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105184291Parkinson's UK G-1102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2017, it is two hundred years since James Parkinson provided the first complete clinical description of the disease named after him, fifty years since the introduction of high-dose D,L-DOPA treatment and twenty years since α-synuclein aggregation came to the fore. In 1998, multiple system atrophy joined Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies as the third major synucleinopathy. Here we review our work, which led to the identification of α-synuclein in Lewy bodies, Lewy neurites and Papp-Lantos bodies, as well as what has happened since. Some of the experiments described were carried out in collaboration with ML Schmidt, JQ Trojanowski and VMY Lee.

Indexed as

alpha-SynucleinHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansLewy Body DiseaseMultiple System AtrophyParkinson Diseasealpha-Synucleinaggregate propagationAlpha-synucleindementia with Lewy bodiesmultiple system atrophyneurodegenerationParkinson’s diseaseprotein aggregation

Identifiers

PMID28282814
PMCPMC5345650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.