SynthesisPloS one2017
Are community-based nurse-led self-management support interventions effective in chronic patients? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07341035 (The Effect of Video-Assisted Genital Hygiene Education on Women's Self-Care Agency and Genital Hygiene Behaviors), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Video-Assisted Genital Hygiene Education on Women's Self-Care Agency and Genital Hygiene Behaviors
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review.BMC primary care · 2023Pooled it
- A mixed-methods systematic review of nurse-led interventions for people with multimorbidity.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Pooled it
- The bigger, the better? A systematic review on the impact of mergers on primary care organizations.European journal of public health · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Community Health Center Based Interventions for People with Diabetes.Journal of community health · 2019Pooled it
- A nurse-led intervention in patients with newly diagnosed cancer and Type 2 diabetes: A pilot randomized controlled trial feasibility study.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- A qualitative study of home care client and caregiver experiences with a complex cardio-respiratory management model.BMC geriatrics · 2021Trial
- Healthy Promotion for Fighting Metabolic Syndrome: Insights from Multi-Center HeRO-FiT Cohort.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Trial
- Effectiveness of Shared Decision-making for Diabetes Prevention: 12-Month Results from the Prediabetes Informed Decision and Education (PRIDE) Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Trial
- Implication of nurse intervention on engagement with urate-lowering drugs: A qualitative study of participants in a RCT of nurse led care.Joint bone spine · 2019Trial
- Implementation of Self-Care Deficits Assessment and a Nurse-Led Supportive Education Program in Community Hospitals for Behavior Change and HbA1c Reduction: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of primary care & community healthTrial
- Evolution of Nursing Education, Research and Practice: Insights to Foster Nurse Solidarity and Address Future Challenges.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Lifestyle Medicine Perspectives from Nursing in Community Care Setting: A Narrative Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of nurse-led hypertension self-management interventions: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Review
- Health Risks Among Rural Aging Populations in China: A Cross-Sectional Study of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Chronic Disease Management.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Protocol for VetASSIST: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate virtual peer health coaching for veterans with multimorbidity.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- Preserving Continuity and Trust in Primary Care: Strategies for Implementing Team-Based Models in South Tyrol, Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences in Non-Communicable Disease Management Within Jordan's Healthy Community Clinics Program.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- The Effect of Self-Management on Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A trust based framework for the envelopment of medical AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Integrated self-management support provided by primary care nurses to persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expansion of primary care and community-based service delivery systems is intended to meet emerging needs, reduce the costs of hospital-based ambulatory care and prevent avoidable hospital use by the provision of more appropriate care. Great emphasis has been placed on the role of self-management in the complex process of care of patient with long-term conditions. Several studies have determined that nurses, among the health professionals, are more recommended to promote health and deliver preventive programs within the primary care context. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of the nurse-led self-management support versus usual care evaluating patient outcomes in chronic care community programs. Systematic review was carried out in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science including RCTs of nurse-led self-management support interventions performed to improve observer reported outcomes (OROs) and patients reported outcomes (PROs), with any method of communication exchange or education in a community setting on patients >18 years of age with a diagnosis of chronic diseases or multi-morbidity. Of the 7,279 papers initially retrieved, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses on systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure reduction (10 studies-3,881 patients) and HbA1c reduction (7 studies-2,669 patients) were carried-out. The pooled MD were: SBP -3.04 (95% CI -5.01--1.06), DBP -1.42 (95% CI -1.42--0.49) and HbA1c -0.15 (95% CI -0.32-0.01) in favor of the experimental groups. Meta-analyses of subgroups showed, among others, a statistically significant effect if the interventions were delivered to patients with diabetes (SBP) or CVD (DBP), if the nurses were specifically trained, if the studies had a sample size higher than 200 patients and if the allocation concealment was not clearly defined. Effects on other OROs and PROs as well as quality of life remain inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.