Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28282424›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Mental health and adjustment to juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Level of agreement between parent and adolescent reports according to Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and Adolescent Outcomes Questionnaire.

Ewa Misterska, Dominika Kaminiarczyk-Pyzałka, Karolina Adamczak, Katarzyna A Adamczyk, Marek Niedziela, Maciej Głowacki, Jakub Głowacki

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ewa MisterskaDepartment of Pedagogy and Psychology, University of Security, Poznan, Poland.
Dominika Kaminiarczyk-PyzałkaDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology and Rheumatology, 2nd Chair of Paediatrics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Karolina AdamczakDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology and Rheumatology, 2nd Chair of Paediatrics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna A AdamczykInstitute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Marek NiedzielaDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology and Rheumatology, 2nd Chair of Paediatrics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Maciej GłowackiDepartment of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland.
Jakub GłowackiHCP Medical Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLAdam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLUniversity of Security in Poznań · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were threefold. Firstly, to analyze the psychometric properties of the Polish-language Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) questionnaire in the self-report Adolescent Outcomes Questionnaire (adolescents, 11-18 years of age) and in the parent-report Adolescent Outcomes Questionnaire (completed by a parent or guardian of an adolescent aged 11-18 years). Secondly, to determine the level of agreement between parents and adolescents in rating dysfunction in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and thirdly, to examine associations between psychological adjustments of patients to JIA and disease as well as their socio-demographic characteristics. The study sample consisted of 52 participants. 26 adolescents between the ages of 11 and 18 years with a diagnosis of JIA and 26 parents were considered for inclusion. Disease course was classified as pauciarticular (n = 12, 46.2%) and polyarticular (n = 14, 53.8%). Participants completed the PODCI (self- and parent- report) twice and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-25 (SDQ-25). Considering the distribution of results regarding PODCI normative scores, 73.1% of parents and 69.2% of patients scored below 50 on the Global Functioning Scale; that is lower than the average for the general healthy population. Regarding the parent report, the total score of the SDQ-25 equaled 11.86 (SD 2.66), whereas the patient report equaled 11.23 (SD 2.78). The study groups do not differ significantly in regards to either the PODCI or the SDQ-25 results. Parents and adolescents with JIA appear to hold very similar perceptions of patients' health. Greater differences emerge as disease severity and age of patients increase. Excellent internal consistency, intrarater and test-retest reliability of the Global Functioning Scale have been confirmed in the Polish version of the PODCI, the questionnaire may therefore aid identification of patients reporting significant problems in this group.

Indexed as

AdolescentArthritis, JuvenileChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthOutcome Assessment, Health CareParentsPolandPsychometricsSelf ReportSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28282424
PMCPMC5345873
OpenAlexW2594046203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.