Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28282411›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Coevolution with bacteria drives the evolution of aerobic fermentation in Lachancea kluyveri.

Nerve Zhou, Krishna B S Swamy, Jun-Yi Leu, Michael J McDonald, Silvia Galafassi, Concetta Compagno, Jure Piškur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ForestEcology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Symbiont selection via alcohol benefits fungus farming by ambrosia beetles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nerve ZhouDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Krishna B S SwamyInstitute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3868-6699
Jun-Yi LeuInstitute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5445-2799
Michael J McDonaldSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Silvia GalafassiDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Concetta CompagnoDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Jure PiškurDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Crabtree positive yeasts, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, prefer fermentation to respiration, even under fully aerobic conditions. The selective pressures that drove the evolution of this trait remain controversial because of the low ATP yield of fermentation compared to respiration. Here we propagate experimental populations of the weak-Crabtree yeast Lachancea kluyveri, in competitive co-culture with bacteria. We find that L. kluyveri adapts by producing quantities of ethanol lethal to bacteria and evolves several of the defining characteristics of Crabtree positive yeasts. We use precise quantitative analysis to show that the rate advantage of fermentation over aerobic respiration is insufficient to provide an overall growth advantage. Thus, the rapid consumption of glucose and the utilization of ethanol are essential for the success of the aerobic fermentation strategy. These results corroborate that selection derived from competition with bacteria could have provided the impetus for the evolution of the Crabtree positive trait.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAerobiosisBacteriaBatch Cell Culture TechniquesCoculture TechniquesEthanolGlycolysisINDEL MutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA, FungalSaccharomycetalesSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeEthanolRNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID28282411
PMCPMC5345805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.