Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28282394›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Transcriptomal profiling of bovine ovarian granulosa and theca interna cells in primary culture in comparison with their in vivo counterparts.

Nicholas Hatzirodos, Claire Glister, Katja Hummitzsch, Helen F Irving-Rodgers, Philip G Knight, Raymond J Rodgers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas HatzirodosDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Claire GlisterSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Hopkins Building, Reading, Whiteknights, United Kingdom.
Katja HummitzschDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Helen F Irving-RodgersDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Philip G KnightSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Hopkins Building, Reading, Whiteknights, United Kingdom.
Raymond J RodgersDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G017174/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro culture of ovarian granulosa cells and theca cells has been very important for our understanding of their function and regulation. One of the most eagerly sought attributes of cell culture is the use of chemically-defined conditions. However, even under such in vitro conditions cell behaviour could differ from the in vivo situation because of differences in oxygen tension, nutrients, adhesion matrix and other factors. To examine this further we compared the transcriptomes of both granulosa cells and cells from the theca interna that were cultured in what are arguably the best in vitro conditions for maintaining the 'follicular' phenotypes of both tissue types, as displayed by their respective freshly-isolated counterparts. The array data analysed are from recently published data and use the same sizes of bovine follicles (small antral 3-6 mm) and the same Affymetrix arrays. We conducted analysis using Partek, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and GOEAST. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering clearly separated the in vivo from the in vitro groups for both cells types and transcriptomes were more homogeneous upon culture. In both cell cultures behaviours associated with cell adhesion, migration and interaction with matrix or substrate were more abundant. However, the pathways involved generally differed between the two cell types. With the thecal cultures a gene expression signature of an immune response was more abundant, probably by leukocytes amongst the cells cultured from the theca interna. These results indicate differences between in vivo and in vitro that should be considered when interpreting in vitro data.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsCattleCells, CulturedCluster AnalysisDown-RegulationFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGranulosa CellsNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrincipal Component AnalysisRNATheca CellsUp-RegulationRNA

Identifiers

PMID28282394
PMCPMC5345798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.