Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28282318›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology clinics2017

What We Have Learned From Animal Models of Dry Eye.

Michael E Stern, Stephen C Pflugfelder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology clinics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Animal Models in Eye Research: Focus on Corneal Pathologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. T-Cell Repertoire Analysis in the Conjunctiva of Murine Dry Eye Model.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The cornea in keratoconjunctivitis sicca.Experimental eye research · 2020
    Review
  18. Inflammatory basis for dry eye disease flares.Experimental eye research · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael E Stern
Stephen C Pflugfelder

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CENTERP30EY002520 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Samuel M Wu · 1985 to 2026
$14.8M
PATHOGENESIS OF CONJUNCTIVAL SQUAMOUS METAPLASIAR01EY011915 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PFLUGFELDER, STEPHEN C · 1997 to 2023
$8.0M
Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY020799 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI NIEDERKORN, JERRY · 2010 to 2016
$4.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002520NEI NIH HHS P30 EY020799NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalDry Eye SyndromesAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsBiomarkersCytokinesHumansBiomarkersCytokines

Identifiers

PMID28282318
PMCPMC5347474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.