Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28282303›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2017

Diversity in the Emerging Critical Care Workforce: Analysis of Demographic Trends in Critical Care Fellows From 2004 to 2014.

Meghan B Lane-Fall, Todd A Miano, Jaya Aysola, John G T Augoustides

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in the Healthcare Workforce.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meghan B Lane-Fall1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 2Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3Center for Healthcare Improvement and Patient Safety, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 4Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 5Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program, Indianapolis, IN. 6NIH-NHLBI PRIDE Research in Implementation Science for Equity, San Francisco, CA. 7Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 8Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 9Office of Diversity and Inclusion, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Todd A Miano
Jaya Aysola
John G T Augoustides

Funding

NIMHD NIH HHS L32 MD008278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDiversity in the physician workforce is essential to providing culturally effective care. In critical care, despite the high stakes and frequency with which cultural concerns arise, it is unknown whether physician diversity reflects that of critically ill patients. We sought to characterize demographic trends in critical care fellows, who represent the emerging intensivist workforce.

designWe used published data to create logistic regression models comparing annual trends in the representation of women and racial/ethnic groups across critical care fellowship types.

settingUnited States Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-approved residency and fellowship training programs. SUBJECTS: Residents and fellows employed by Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accredited training programs from 2004 to 2014.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsFrom 2004 to 2014, the number of critical care fellows increased annually, up 54.1% from 1,606 in 2004-2005 to 2,475 in 2013-2014. The proportion of female critical care fellows increased from 29.5% (2004-2005) to 38.3% (2013-2014) (p < 0.001). The absolute number of black fellows increased each year but the percentage change was not statistically significantly different (5.1% in 2004-2005 vs 3.9% in 2013-2014; p = 0.92). Hispanic fellows increased in number from 124 (7.7%) in 2004-2005 to 216 (8.4%) in 2013-2014 (p = 0.015). The number of American Indian/Alaskan Native/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander fellows decreased from 15 (1.0%) to seven (0.3%) (p < 0.001). When compared with population estimates, female critical care fellows and those from racial/ethnic minorities were underrepresented in all years.

conclusionsThe demographics of the emerging critical care physician workforce reflect underrepresentation of women and racial/ethnic minorities. Trends highlight increases in women and Hispanics and stable or decreasing representation of non-Hispanic underrepresented minority critical care fellows. Further research is needed to elucidate the reasons underlying persistent underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in critical care fellowship programs.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityBlack or African AmericanCritical CareCross-Sectional StudiesHispanic or LatinoHumansIndians, North AmericanInternship and ResidencyPhysicians, WomenRacial GroupsRetrospective StudiesSex DistributionSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID28282303
PMCPMC5392161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.