Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28282061›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2017

Hydroxychloroquine retinopathy.

I H Yusuf, S Sharma, R Luqmani, S M Downes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
21.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 265 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Short-term variability of the multifocal ERG in clinical settings.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Decoding the Prescriber: Dermatology Versus Rheumatology Approaches.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2025
    Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I H YusufThe Oxford Eye Hospital, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
S SharmaThe Oxford Eye Hospital, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
R LuqmaniDepartment of Rheumatology, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
S M DownesThe Oxford Eye Hospital, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R000735/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ; Plaquenil) is used increasingly in the management of a variety of autoimmune disorders, with well established roles in dermatology and rheumatology and emerging roles in oncology. Hydroxychloroquine has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus; some clinicians advocate its use in all such patients. However, Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine (CQ) have been associated with irreversible visual loss due to retinal toxicity. Hydroxychloroquine retinal toxicity is far more common than previously considered; an overall prevalence of 7.5% was identified in patients taking HCQ for greater than 5 years, rising to almost 20% after 20 years of treatment. This review aims to provide an update on HCQ/CQ retinopathy. We summarise emerging treatment indications and evidence of efficacy in systemic disease, risk factors for retinopathy, prevalence among HCQ users, diagnostic tests, and management of HCQ retinopathy. We highlight emerging risk factors such as tamoxifen use, and new guidance on safe dosing, reversing the previous recommendation to use ideal body weight, rather than actual body weight. We summarise uncertainties and the recommendations made by existing HCQ screening programmes. Asian patients with HCQ retinopathy may demonstrate an extramacular or pericentral pattern of disease; visual field testing and retinal imaging should include a wider field for screening in this group. HCQ is generally safe and effective for the treatment of systemic disease but because of the risk of HCQ retinal toxicity, modern screening methods and ideal dosing should be implemented. Guidelines regarding optimal dosing and screening regarding HCQ need to be more widely disseminated.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsConnective Tissue DiseasesDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalGlobal HealthHumansHydroxychloroquineIncidenceRetinaRetinal DiseasesRisk FactorsAntirheumatic AgentsHydroxychloroquine

Identifiers

PMID28282061
PMCPMC5518824
OpenAlexW4211193988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.