ArticleScience and engineering ethics2018
Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment.
Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.Science and engineering ethics · 2026Article
- A low-cost approach to high quality responsible conduct of research education.International journal of ethics education · 2026Article
- Seeking help as a strategy for ethical and professional decision-making in research: Perspectives of researchers from East Asia and the United States.Accountability in research · 2025Article
- A roadmap to good practice for training supervisors and leadership: a European perspective.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2025Article
- Ethical decision-making and role conflict in managing a scientific laboratory.Accountability in research · 2024Article
- How Do Chemistry Faculty and Graduate Students Engage in Decision Making on Issues Related to Ethical and Responsible Conduct of Research Including Authorship?Science and engineering ethics · 2022Article
- Taiwanese and American Graduate Students' Misconceptions Regarding Responsible Conduct of Research: A Cross-National Comparison Using a Two-Tier Test Approach.Science and engineering ethics · 2021Article
- Article
- A randomized trial of a lab-embedded discourse intervention to improve research ethics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Researchers' perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam.Research integrity and peer review · 2019Article
- Mentorship and Ethics in Global Health: Fostering Scientific Integrity and Responsible Conduct of Research.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019Article
- Intervention to Promote Responsible Conduct of Research Mentoring.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite more than 25 years of a requirement for training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR), there is still little consensus about what such training should include, how it should be delivered, nor what constitutes "effectiveness" of such training. This lack of consensus on content, approaches and outcomes is evident in recent data showing high variability in the development and implementation of RCR instruction across universities and programs. If we accept that one of the primary aims of instruction in RCR/research ethics is "to foster a community of social responsibility" (Antes et al. 2009: 398), then it makes sense to consider the research environment itself-where learning one's science happens where one also engages in social interaction around that science. In order to take the best advantage of that already existing/naturally occurring research environment, the authors, through a deliberative, collaborative, and integrative process, crafted a workshop curriculum meant to arm research faculty with concrete and specific tools to effectively introduce research ethics in the context of the research environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28281158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.