Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28281109›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2017

Neuropeptides as a Marker for Chronic Headache.

Nuria Riesco, Eva Cernuda-Morollón, Julio Pascual

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Retinal nerve fiber layer changes in migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Blockers of Wnt3a, Wnt10a, or β-Catenin Prevent Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain In Vivo.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nuria RiescoService of Neurology, University Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Eva Cernuda-MorollónService of Neurology, University Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Julio PascualService of Neurology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla and IDIVAL, Av. Valdecilla s/n, 39008, Santander, Spain. juliopascual@telefonica.net.
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to revise current evidence on trigemino-vascular system (TVS) neuropeptides as potential biomarkers for chronic primary headaches, mainly for chronic migraine (CM). RECENT

findingsWithin sensory neuropeptides, released by an activated trigeminal nerve, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) levels seem to be a good biomarker of acute migraine and somewhat sensitive and specific for CM. CGRP, however, is not increased in 20-30% of CM patients, which suggests that CGRP is not the only neuropeptide involved in migraine pain generation and maintenance. Data for other sensory neuropeptides are inconsistent (neurokinin, substance P) or absent (amylin and cholecystokinin-8). Among parasympathetic neuropeptides, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) is increased interictally in CM, and in at least some migraine cases ictally, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) has been shown to be increased ictally in jugular blood, but interictal, peripheral data do not indicate such an increase, and there are no data for other parasympathetic peptides. Finally, S100B, as a potential marker of glial TVS activation, has been studied with inconsistent results in migraine patients. Current data on TVS neuropeptides as potential migraine biomarkers must be taken with caution, even for the promising case of CGRP. We do not know with certainty whether increased levels are the reflection of TVS activation, the reliability and homogeneity of the different laboratory tests, or what is the influence on these measurements of the short half-life of many of these peptides or of preventive treatments. One further limitation would be whether the described increases in levels of some neuropeptides such as CGRP are specific for migraine versus other headaches.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHeadache DisordersHumansNeuropeptidesBiomarkersNeuropeptidesCGRPChronic migraineEpisodic migrainePACAPS100BVIP

Identifiers

PMID28281109
OpenAlexW2592872292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.