Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28280963›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2017

Development of an in vitro Bioassay for Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (rHuEPO) Based on Proliferative Stimulation of an Erythroid Cell Line and Analysis of Sialic Acid Dependent Microheterogeneity: UT-7 Cell Bioassay.

Manoj Kumar Metta, Vasavi Malkhed, Srinivasan Tantravahi, Uma Vuruputuri, Rajkumar Kunaparaju

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manoj Kumar MettaDepartment of Biotechnology, GIS, GITAM University, Gandhi Nagar, Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 530045, India.
Vasavi MalkhedDepartment of Chemistry, University College of Science Saifabad, Osmania University, Saifabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500004, India.
Srinivasan TantravahiDepartment of Biotechnology, GIS, GITAM University, Gandhi Nagar, Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 530045, India. saveplants@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3966-8281
Uma VuruputuriDepartment of Chemistry, University College of Science, Osmania University, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India.
Rajkumar KunaparajuUsha Biotech, 62/A, 1st Floor, Sundari Reddy Bhavan, Beside Heritage Fresh, Vengal Rao Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500038, India.
GITAM University · INOsmania University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determination of biological activity and its comparison with clinical behavior is important in the quality assessment of therapeutic glycoproteins. In vivo studies are usually employed for evaluating bioactivity of these glycomolecules. However, alternative methods are required to simplify the bioassay and avoid ethical issues associated with in vivo studies. Negatively charged sialic acid residues are known to be critical for in vivo bioactivity of rHuEPO. To address this need, we employed the human acute myeloid leukemia cell line UT-7 for the determination of proliferative stimulation induced by rHuEPO. Relative potencies of various intact and sugar-trimmed rHuEPO preparations were estimated using the International Standard for Human r-DNA derived EPO (87/684) as a reference for bioactivity. The cellular response was measured with a multi-channel photometer using a colorimetric microassay, based on the metabolism of the Resazurin sodium by cell viability. For a resourceful probing of physiological features of rHuEPO with significance, we obtained partly or completely desialylated rHuEPO digested by the neuraminidase enzyme without degradation of carbohydrates. Two-fold higher specific activity was shown by asialoerythropoietin in in vitro analysis compared with the sialoerythropoietin. Further, computational studies were also carried out to construct the 3D model of the erythropoietin (EPO) protein structure using standard comparative modeling methods. The quality of the model was validated using Procheck and protein structure analysis (ProSA) server tools. N-glycan units were constructed; moreover, EPO protein was glycosylated at potential glycosylation amino acid residue sites. The method described should be suitable for potency assessments of pharmaceutical formulations of rHuEPO (European Pharmacopeia, 2016).

Indexed as

Biological AssayCell ProliferationCell SurvivalErythroid CellsErythropoietinGlycoproteinsGlycosylationHumansModels, MolecularN-Acetylneuraminic AcidProtein BindingProtein ConformationRecombinant ProteinsEPO protein, humanErythropoietinGlycoproteinsN-Acetylneuraminic AcidRecombinant ProteinsBiological activityIn vitro bioassayProcheck and ProSARecombinant human erythropoietinUT-7 cell line

Identifiers

PMID28280963
OpenAlexW2594589170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.