Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28280891›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Number of medications and adverse drug events by unintentional poisoning among older adults in consideration of inappropriate drug use: a Swedish population-based matched case-control study.

Christian Rausch, L Laflamme, U Bültmann, J Möller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian RauschDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska huset 4:th floor, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE 17177, Stockholm, Sweden. christian.rausch@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6665-9663
L LaflammeDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska huset 4:th floor, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
U BültmannDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, FA10, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J MöllerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska huset 4:th floor, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis national, population-based study aims to determine the association between the number of prescribed medications and adverse drug events (ADE) by unintentional poisoning and examine this risk when known indicators of inappropriate drug use (IDU) are accounted for.

methodsWe employed a matched case-control design among people living in Sweden who were 50 years and older. Cases experiencing an ADE by unintentional poisoning resulting in hospitalization or death (n = 5336) were extracted from the National Health and Death Registers from January 2006 to December 2009. Four controls per case matched by age, sex and residential area were randomly selected among those without an ADE (n = 21,344). Prescribed medications dispensed during the 4-month period prior to the ADE were identified via the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and coded according to the number of different dispensed medications (NDDM) (0 to 10 medications) and IDU indicators (one single-drug, and three drug-combinations). Conditional logistic regression was used.

resultsEach of the IDU indicators was significantly associated with very high risks of ADE. For NDDM, we found a lower but graded positive association from two to ten or more medications (adjusted OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8). Exclusion of IDU from the NDDM decreased the risk of ADE, but the effects remained significant for three or more medications (adjusted OR excl. IDU, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0).

conclusionAt population level, the number of different dispensed medications starting from three or more remains associated with ADE even after adjusting for known IDUs. Clinicians and patients need to be made aware of the increased likelihood of serious ADE, not only in case of documented inappropriate medications but also in the case of an increasing number of medications.

Indexed as

AgedCase-Control StudiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHospitalizationHumansInappropriate PrescribingLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPoisoningPolypharmacyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription DrugsSwedenPrescription DrugsAdverse drug eventsElderlyOlderPoisoningPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID28280891
PMCPMC5423926
OpenAlexW2592772094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.