Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28280619›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2017

Prognostic value of diffuse versus intestinal histotype in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fausto Petrelli, Rosa Berenato, Luca Turati, Alessia Mennitto, Francesca Steccanella, Marta Caporale, Pierpaolo Dallera, Filippo de Braud, Ezio Pezzica, Maria Di Bartolomeo and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Leveraging data-driven insights for esophageal and gastric cancer diagnosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The relationship between the gastric cancer microbiome and clinicopathological factors: a metagenomic investigation from the 100,000 genomes project and The Cancer Genome Atlas.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fausto PetrelliMedical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Rosa BerenatoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Luca TuratiSurgical Oncology Unit, Surgery Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Alessia MennittoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Francesca SteccanellaSurgical Oncology Unit, Surgery Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Marta CaporaleMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Pierpaolo DalleraSurgical Oncology Unit, Surgery Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Filippo de BraudMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Ezio PezzicaPathology Unit, Oncology Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Maria Di BartolomeoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni SgroiSurgical Oncology Unit, Surgery Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Vincenzo MazzaferroHepatobiliopancreatic Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Filippo PietrantonioMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Sandro BarniMedical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Bergamo OvestAzienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are two distinct types of gastric carcinoma (GC), intestinal, more frequently sporadic and linked to environmental factors, and diffuse (undifferentiated) that is highly metastatic and characterized by rapid disease progression and a poor prognosis. However, there are many conflicting data in the literature concerning the association between histology and prognosis in GC. This meta-analysis was performed to provide demonstration if histology according to Lauren classification is associated with different prognosis in patients with GC.

methodsWe searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, and EMBASE for all eligible studies. The combined hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in terms of overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

resultsA total of 73 published studies including 61,468 patients with GC were included in this meta-analysis. Our analysis indicates that GC patients with diffuse-type histology have a worst prognosis than those with intestinal subgroup in all studies (HR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.17-1.29; P<0.0001), in both loco-regional confined (HR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.30; P<0.0001) and advanced disease (HR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.046-1.50; P=0.014), in Asiatic (HR 1.2; 95% CI, 1.14-1.27; P<0.0001) and Western patients (HR 1.3; 95% CI, 1.19-1.41; P<0.0001), and in those not exposed (HR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.24; P<0.0001) or exposed (HR 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.37; P<0.0001) to (neo)adjuvant therapy.

conclusionsOur results indicated that histology might be a useful prognostic marker for both early and advanced GC patients, with intestinal-type associated with a better outcome. This information could be used for stratification purpose in future clinical trials.

Indexed as

diffuse histologyGastric cancer (GC)Lauren classificationmeta-analysisprognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID28280619
PMCPMC5334055
OpenAlexW2590716686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.